ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Multiple aspect based task analysis (MABTA) for user requirements gathering in highly-contextualized interactive system design
Full text PdfPdf (617 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 86 archive
Proceedings of the 3rd annual conference on Task models and diagrams table of contents
Prague, Czech Republic
SESSION: Task models for groupware and multitasking table of contents
Pages: 7 - 15  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-59593-000-0
Author
Youn-Kyung Lim  Indiana University, Bloomington, IN
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 73,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1045446.1045451
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Many traditional methods in the task analysis area are developed for analyzing the task structure of interactions involving individual users. Nowadays more issues have been raised in dealing with group work task analysis. Accommodating contextual information as a part of task modeling is a potentially fertile arena of exploration in this area. This paper proposes a mechanism, multiple aspect based task analysis (MABTA), as another new way to support a combination of emphasis on context with the method of task analysis, focusing on accommodating multiple aspects of users' group work situation into task analysis. The research goal is to identify and to analyze user interface design requirements through this new mechanism, MABTA. A case study was introduced in order to demonstrate the benefits of this mechanism.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aboulafia, A., Bannon, L., and Fernström, M. Shifting perspective from effect to affect: Some framing questions. Proc. International Conference on Affective Human Factors Design, Asean Academic Press (2001), 415--422.
 
2
3
4
 
5
Kaasgaard, K. Software Design and Usability: Talks with Bonnie Nardi, Jakob Nielsen, David Smith, Austin Henderson & Jed Harris, Terry Winograd and Stephanie Rosen. Copenhagen Business School Press, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000.
 
6
Lim, Y., and Sato. K. Encoding Scenarios with Design Information Framework for the Generation of Multiple Aspect Models for System Implementation. Proc. SC12003. IIIS Press (2003).
7
8
 
9
 
10
11
12
 
13
Rogers, Y. New theoretical approaches for HCI. To appear in ARIST: Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, (Eds. B. Cronin and D. Shaw), 38 (2004).
14
15
16