ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Centralization momentum: the pendulum swings back again
Full text HtmlHtml (25 KB),  PdfPdf (97 KB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 48 ,  Issue 2  (February 2005) table of contents
Medical image modeling
Pages: 66 - 71  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISSN:0001-0782
Authors
J. Roberto Evaristo  University of Illinois at Chicago
Kevin C. Desouza  University of Illinois at Chicago
Kevin Hollister  Vivendi Water Systems, Madrid, Spain
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 99,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1042091.1042092
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Discussing whether IT architecture should be centralized or decentralized is as old as the technology itself. We propose that, notwithstanding the various perspectives that have been brought to the debate, what is missing thus far is the seesaw between centralization and decentralization. The reasons for this important phenomenon relate not only to IT-centric issues but also to current events pervading other areas of the organization. One key issue is how management has changed its IT focus from a "must have/keeping up with the Joneses" investment to a value-based "where's the beef?" approach pragmatically emphasizing the relevance of data and its uses. A second consideration is the business requirements for a reliable, available, fault-tolerant, backed-up, secure IT environment, even in the face of catastrophic events, including the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Executives cannot afford to not know why the renewed focus on IT architecture centralization has happened and how it might affect their organizations.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Cappuccio, D. Gartner view: Think local, control global. CIO Mag. (Nov. 1, 1995).
 
2
Hammer, M. and Champy, J. Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Harper Business, New York, 1993.
3
 
4
LaBelle, A. and Nyce, H. Wither the IT organization? Sloan Manage. Rev. 8, 4 (1987), 75--79.
 
5
Malone, T. IS empowerment just a fad? Sloan Manage. Rev. 38, 2 (1997).
 
6
The Economist. IT grows up (Aug. 22, 2002).
 
7
The Economist. Less than the sum of its parts (June 23, 2001).
 
8
The Economist. The Cemex way (June 16, 2001).
 
9
The Economist. Electronic glue (May 31, 2001).
 
10
Von Simson, E. The `centrally decentralized' IS organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 68, 4 (July-Aug. 1990), 158--162.
 
11
Von Simson, E. The recentralization of IT. Computerworld 29, 51 (1995), 1--5.


REVIEW

"Charles William Bash : Reviewer"

Since the beginning of information technology, people have argued over whether all of the equipment should be physically close to the other pieces or physically distributed. For much of the time, the dominant issues were: "How to get the cards to   more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
J. Roberto Evaristo: colleagues
Kevin C. Desouza: colleagues
Kevin Hollister: colleagues