ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
The centrality of pivotal points in the evolution of scientific networks
Full text PdfPdf (733 KB)
Source International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces archive
Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces table of contents
San Diego, California, USA
SESSION: Long papers: visualization and presentation table of contents
Pages: 98 - 105  
Year of Publication: 2005
ISBN:1-58113-894-6
Author
Chaomei Chen  Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA
Sponsors
SIGART: ACM Special Interest Group on Artificial Intelligence
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 49,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1040830.1040859
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe the development of CiteSpace as an integrated environment for identifying and tracking thematic trends in scientific literature. The goal is to simplify the process of finding not only highly cited clusters of scientific articles, but also pivotal points and trails that are likely to characterize fundamental transitions of a knowledge domain as a whole. The trails of an advancing research field are captured through a sequence of snapshots of its intellectual structure over time in the form of Pathfinder networks. These networks are subsequently merged with a localized pruning algorithm. Pivotal points in the merged network are algorithmically identified and visualized using the betweenness centrality metric. An example of finding clinical evidence associated with reducing risks of heart diseases is included to illustrate how CiteSpace could be used. The contribution of the work is its integration of various change detection algorithms and interactive visualization capabilities to simply users' tasks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Brandes, U. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25, 2 (2001), 163--177.
3
 
4
 
5
Chen, C. Generalised Similarity Analysis and Pathfinder Network Scaling. Interacting with Computers, 10, 2 (1998), 107--128.
 
6
Chen, C. Information Visualization: Beyond the Horizon. Springer, London, 2004.
 
7
Chen, C. Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive Knowledge Domain Visualization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101 (2004), 5303--5310.
 
8
Chen, C. and Morris, S. Visualizing evolving networks: Minimum spanning trees versus Pathfinder networks. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (Seattle, Washington, 2003), IEEE Computer Society Press, 2003, 67--74.
 
9
Deerwester, S., Dumais, S. T., Landauer, T. K., Furnas, G. W. and Harshman, R. A. Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 6 (1990), 391--407.
 
10
Erten, C., Harding, P. J., Kobourov, S. G., Wampler, K. and Yee, G. Exploring the computing literature using temporal graph visualization. In Conference on Visualization and Data Analysis (VDA) (2004), 2004.
 
11
Freeman, L. C. A set of measuring centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40 (1977), 35--41.
 
12
Girvan, M. and Newman, M. E. J. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99 (2002), 7821--7826.
 
13
Granovetter, M. Strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 8 (1973), 1360--1380.
 
14
 
15
Kessler, M. M. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14 (1963), 10--25.
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
Price, D. D. Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149 (1965), 510--515.
 
21
Radicchi, F., Castellano, C., Cecconi, F., Loreto, V. and Parisi, D. Defining and identifying communities in networks arXiv: cond- mat/ 0309488 v1, 2003.
22
23
 
24
 
25
Small, H. G. A co-citation model of a scientific specialty: A longitudinal study of collagen research. Soc. Stud. Sci., 7 (1977), 139--166.
 
26
Swan, R. and Jensen, D. TimeMines: Constructing timelines with statistical models of word usage. In the Sixth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (2000), 2000.
 
27
White, H. D., Lin, X., Buzydlowski, J. W. and Chen, C. User-controlled mapping of significant literatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101 (2004), 5297--5302.