|
ABSTRACT
Service-oriented computing is meant to support loose relationships between organisations: Collaboration procedures on the application-level translate to interaction processes via Web Services. Service composition deals with the specification and enforcent of such processes. Its main focus is on service <i>orchestration</i> where workflow managent is utilised for proactive coordination. In such an approach, coordination process and interaction logic are usually captured in the same workflow - which leads to deficiencies in recognising the possible impact of operational coordination on the interaction logic. In this paper, we claim that the choice of coordination alternatives impacts the quality of the composed service and has to be customised to each specific service case. As a consequence, we outline a solution that is based on <i>service interaction patterns</i> where the paradigms of patterns and idioms are applied to interaction procedures and orchestration processes. This allows studying a) reusable interaction patterns typical for service relationships and b) for each pattern a range of possible coordination idioms. Finally, we sketch a technique that refines the service logic based on analysis of its interaction patterns and utilisation of suitable coordination idioms selected by rules in terms of changing service context.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
G. Alonso, F. Casati, H. Kuno, and V. Machiraju, Web Services - Concepts, Architectures and Applications: Springer, 2004.
|
| |
4
|
G. D. Michelis et al. "Cooperative Information Systs: A Manifesto", in Cooperative Information Syst: Trends and Directions, M. P. Papazoglou and G. Schlageter, Eds.: Acadic Press, 1997.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
N. Kavantzas, D. Burdett, and G. Ritzinger, "Web Services Choreography Description Language Version 1.0", W3C Working Draft 27 April 2004.
|
| |
7
|
C. Peltz, "Web Service orchestration and choreography: a look at WSCI and BPEL4WS - Feature", Web Services Journal, vol. 3, 2003.
|
| |
8
|
F. Curbera, Y. Goland, J. Klein, F. Leymann, D. Roller, S. Thatte, and S. Weerawarana, "Business Process Execution Language for Web Services, Version 1.0", BEA, IBM, Microsoft 31 July 2002.
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
P. Grefen, K. Aberer, Y. Hoffner, and H. Ludwig, "CrossFlow: cross-organizational workflow managent in dynamic virtual enterprises", Computer Systs Science and Engineering, vol. 15, pp. 277--90, 2000.
|
| |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
M. Dumas, B. Benatallah, and Z. Maamar, "Definition and Execution of Composite Web Services: The SELF-SERV Project", Data Engineering Bulletin, vol. 25, 2002.
|
| |
14
|
|
| |
15
|
B. Orriëns, J. Yang, and M. P. Papazoglou, "A Framework for Business Rule Driven Service Composition", in 4th Int. Workshop, TES 2003, B. Benatallah and M.-C. Shan, Eds.: Springer, 2003, pp. 14--27.
|
| |
16
|
|
| |
17
|
C. Zirpins and G. Piccinelli, "Evolution of Service Processes by Rule Based Transformation", in IFIP Int. Conf. I3E 2004, W. Lamersdorf, V. Tschammer, and S. Amarger, Eds.: Kluwer, 2004, pp. 287--305.
|
| |
18
|
G. Joeris and O. Herzog, "Managing Evolving Workflow Specications with Scha Versioning and Migration Rules", University of Bren TZI Technical Report 15, 1999.
|
| |
19
|
Frank Buschmann , Regine Meunier , Hans Rohnert , Peter Sommerlad , Michael Stal, Pattern-oriented software architecture: a system of patterns, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY, 1996
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
|