ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A partial join approach for mining co-location patterns
Full text PdfPdf (196 KB)
Source Geographic Information Systems archive
Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international workshop on Geographic information systems table of contents
Washington DC, USA
SESSION: Data mining table of contents
Pages: 241 - 249  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-979-9
Authors
Jin Soung Yoo  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
Shashi Shekhar  University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
John Smith  The Kumquat Consortium
Julius P. Kumquat  The Kumquat Consortium
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 16,   Downloads (12 Months): 67,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1032222.1032258
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Spatial co-location patterns represent the subsets of events whose instances are frequently located together in geographic space. We identified the computational bottleneck in the execution time of a current co-location mining algorithm. A large fraction of the join-based co-location miner algorithm is devoted to computing joins to identify instances of candidate co-location patterns. We propose a novel <i>partial-join</i> approach for mining co-location patterns efficiently. It transactionizes continuous spatial data while keeping track of the spatial information not modeled by transactions. It uses a transaction-based <i>Apriori</i> algorithm as a building block and adopts the instance join method for residual instances not identified in transactions. We show that the algorithm is correct and complete in finding all co-location rules which have prevalence and conditional probability above the given thresholds. An experimental evaluation using synthetic datasets and a real dataset shows that our algorithm is computationally more efficient than the join-based algorithm.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
C. Borgelt. Efficient implementations of apriori and eclat. In Workshop of Frequent Item Set Mining Implementations FIMI, 2003.
 
5
 
6
 
7
B. Goethals. Frequent pattern mining implementations. http://www.cs.helsinki../u/goethals/software/index.html.
8
9
 
10
11
12
 
13
 
14
S. Shekhar and S. Chawla. Spatial Databases: A Tour. Prentice Hall, ISBN 0130174807, 2003.
 
15
S. Shekhar and Y. Huang. Co-location Rules Mining: A Summary of Results. In Proc. of Symposium on Spatio and Temporal Database, 2001.
 
16
P. Tan, M. Steinbach, V. Kumar, C. Potter, S. Klooster, and A. Torregrosa. Finding spatio-temporal patterns in earth science data. In Proc. of KDD Workshop on Temporal Data Mining, 2001.
 
17
H. Xiong, S. Shekhar, Y. Huang, V. Kumar, X. Ma, and J. S. Yoo. A Framework for Discovering Co-location Patterns in Data Sets with Extended Spatial Objects. In Proc. 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining (SDM), 2004.
 
18
M. J. Zaki and S. Parthasarathy. New algorithms for fast discovery of association rules. In Proc. of ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1997.
19
20

CITED BY  8

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jin Soung Yoo: colleagues
Shashi Shekhar: colleagues
John Smith: colleagues
Julius P. Kumquat: colleagues