ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Representing spatiality in a conceptual multidimensional model
Full text PdfPdf (203 KB)
Source Geographic Information Systems archive
Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international workshop on Geographic information systems table of contents
Washington DC, USA
SESSION: Conceptual modeling and metadata table of contents
Pages: 12 - 22  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-979-9
Authors
Elzbieta Malinowski  UniversitéLibre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
Esteban Zimányi  UniversitéLibre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
Sponsors
SIGIR: ACM Special Interest Group on Information Retrieval
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 17,   Downloads (12 Months): 116,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1032222.1032226
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Data Warehouses and On-Line Analytical Processing systems rely on a multidimensional model that includes dimensions, hierarchies, and measures. Such model allows to express users' requirements for supporting the decision-making process and to facilitate its afterward implementation. Although Data Warehouses typically include a spatial or location dimension, this dimension is usually represented in an alphanumeric format. However, it is well-known that a visual representation of spatial data allows to reveal patterns that are difficult to discover otherwise. Further, a multidimensional model is seldom used for representing spatial data.

In this work we propose an extension of a conceptual multidimensional model with spatial dimensions, spatial hierarchies, and spatial measures. We also consider the inclusion of topological relationships and topological operators in the model. We analyze different scenarios showing the significance and convenience of the proposed extension.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Y. Bédard, T. Merrett, and J. Han. Fundaments of spatial data warehousing for geographic knowledge discovery. In H. Miller and J. Han, editors,Geographic Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 53--73. Taylor & Francis, 2001.
 
2
M. Egenhofer. A model for detailed binary topological relationships. Geomatica, 47(3&4):261--273, 1993.
 
3
ESRI, Inc. ArcGIS data models. http://www.esri.com/software/arcgisdatamodels/index.html, 2004.
 
4
 
5
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
H. Jullens. Spatial customer intelligence: The map shows the future. GeoInformatics, 3(12), 2000.
 
10
 
11
Z. Kouba, K. Matou&ššek, and P. Mikšovský. Novel knowledge discovery tools in industrial applications. In Proc. of the Workshop on Intelligent Methods for Quality Improvement in Industrial Practice, pages 72--83, 2002.
 
12
 
13
 
14
E. Malinowski and E. Zimányi. A conceptual representation of spatial hierarchies in data warehouse and OLAP systems. To appear, 2004.
 
15
E. Malinowski and E. Zimányi. OLAP hierarchies: A conceptual perspective. In Proc. of the 16th Int. Conf. on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pages 477--491, 2004.
 
16
M. Mark and M. Egenhofer. Modeling spatial relations between lines and regions: Combining formal mathematical models and human subjects testing. Cartography and Geographical Information Systems, 21(3):195--212, 1994.
 
17
M. Miquel, A. Brisebois, Y. Bédard, and G. Edwards. Implementation and evaluation of hypercube-based method for spatio-temporal exploration and anlysis. http://sirs.scg.ulaval.ca/yvanbedard/enseigne/SCG66124/345-A.pdf, 2004.
 
18
 
19
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
26
 
27
 
28
S. Rivest, Y. Bédard, and P. Marchand. Toward better suppport for spatial decision making: Defining the characteristics of spatial on-line analytical processing (SOLAP). Geomatica, 55(4):539--555, 2001.
 
29
 
30
S. Shekhar and S. Chawla. Spatial Databases: A Tour. Prentice Hall, 2003.
 
31
32
 
33
N. Tryfona and M. Egenhofer. Consistency among parts and aggregates: a computational model. Transactions in GIS, 4(3):189--206, 1997.
 
34
N. Tryfona, R. Price, and C. Jensen. Conceptual models for spatio-temporal applications. In Spatio-Temporal Databases: The Chorochronos Approach, chapter 3, pages 79--116. Springer, 2003.

CITED BY  7

Collaborative Colleagues:
Elzbieta Malinowski: colleagues
Esteban Zimányi: colleagues