ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Taking it out of context: collaborating within and across cultures in face-to-face settings and via instant messaging
Full text PdfPdf (413 KB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
Chicago, Illinois, USA
SESSION: Synchronous collaboration table of contents
Pages: 604 - 613  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-810-5
Authors
Leslie D. Setlock  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Susan R. Fussell  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Christine Neuwirth  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 28,   Downloads (12 Months): 196,   Citation Count: 15
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1031607.1031712
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

As new communications media foster international collaborations, we would be remiss in overlooking cultural differences when assessing them. In this study, 24 pairs in three cultural groupings--American-American (AA), Chinese-Chinese (CC) and American-Chinese (AC) --worked on two decision-making tasks, one face-to-face and the other via IM. Drawing upon prior research, we predicted differences in conversational efficiency, conversational content, interaction quality, persuasion, and performance. The quantitative results combined with conversation analysis suggest that the groups viewed the task differently--AA pairs as an exercise in situation-specific compromise; CC as consensus-reaching. Cultural differences were reduced but not eliminated in the IM condition.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Armstrong, D., & Cole, P. (2002). Managing distances and differences in geographically distributed work groups. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.) Distributed work (pp. 167--186). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3
 
4
Brock, T.C. (1965). Communicator-recipient similarity and decision change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 650--654.
 
5
Brown, P., & Levinson, S (1987). Universals in Language Usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness (pp. 56--289). Cambridge,: Cambridge University Press.
6
 
7
Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, R. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.). Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127--149). Washington, DC: APA Press.
 
8
Clark, H. H. & Marshall, C. E. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. K. Joshi, B. L. Webber & I. A. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 10--63). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
9
Clark, H. H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1--39.
 
10
11
 
12
Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1984). Information richness: a new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In L. L. Cummings & B.M. Staw, (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior 6, (pp. 191--233). Homewood, IL: JAI Press.
 
13
Doherty-Sneddon, G., Anderson, A. H., O'Malley, C., Langton, S., Garrod, S. & Bruce, V. (1997). Face-to-face and video mediated communication: a comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 3,105--125.
14
 
15
Fussell, S. R., & Krauss, R. M. (1992). Coordination of knowledge in communication: Effects of speakers' assumptions about what others know. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 378--391.
16
 
17
Fussell, S. R., Setlock, L. D., Yang, J., Ou, J., Mauer, E. M., & Kramer, A. (in press). Gestures over video streams to support remote collaboration on physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction.
18
 
19
Gudykunst, W. & Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). Culture and Interpersonal Communication. Newbury Park, CA Sage.
 
20
Hall, E. 1976/1981. Beyond culture. NY: Doubleday Anchor Books.
21
 
22
Holtgraves, T. (1997) Styles of language use: Individual and cultural variability in conversational indirectness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 624--637.
 
23
Holtgraves, T. & Yang, J. (1992) Interpersonal underpinnings of request strategies: General principles and differences due to culture and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 246--256.
 
24
Hupet, M., Chantraine, Y., & Neff, F. (1993). References in conversation between young and old normal adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 339--346.
 
25
Isaacs, E., & Clark, H. H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. J. of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26--37.
26
 
27
28
 
29
Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., Brennen, S. E., & Siegel, J. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technologies to support remote collaborative work. In P. Hinds & S. Kiesler (Eds.) Distributed work (pp. 137--162). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
30
Kraut, R. E., Fussell, S. R., & Siegel, J. (2003). Visual information as a conversational resource in collaborative physical tasks. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, 13--49.
31
 
32
Lundeberg, M., Fox, P., Brown, A., and Elbedour, S. (2000) Cultural Influences on Confidence: Country and Gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 152--159.
 
33
Mackie, D.M. (1986) Social identification effects in group polarization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 730--728.
 
34
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 20, 568--579.
35
 
36
Matheson, K. (1991) Social cues in computer-mediated negotiations: Gender makes a difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 137--145.
 
37
Morand, D. (1995) Politeness as a Universal Variable. The International Journal of Organization Analysis, 3, 52--74.
38
39
 
40
Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139--179.
 
41
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M. & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3--72.
 
42
Pennebaker, J.W., & Francis, M.E. (1999). Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC {software program for text analysis}. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
 
43
Ralston, D., Cunniff, M., Gustafson, D. (1995) Cultural Accomodation: The effect of language on the responses of bilingual Hong Kong Chinese managers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 714--727.
 
44
Straus, S., & McGrath, J. Does the Medium Matter? The Interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. (1994) Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87--97.
 
45
Schwartz, S. (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 Countries. In M. Zanna (Ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1--65.
 
46
Setlock, L. D., Fussell, S. R., Kiesler, S., & Weisband, S. (under review). Managing work trajectories in collaborative writing.
 
47
 
48
Triandis, H. (1980). Values, attitudes, and interpersonal behavior, In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes, and Values (pp. 195--259). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
 
49
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and behavior in different cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506--520.
50

CITED BY  15

Collaborative Colleagues:
Leslie D. Setlock: colleagues
Susan R. Fussell: colleagues
Christine Neuwirth: colleagues