ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
QnA: augmenting an instant messaging client to balance user responsiveness and performance
Full text PdfPdf (137 KB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
Chicago, Illinois, USA
SESSION: May I interrupt? table of contents
Pages: 515 - 518  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-810-5
Authors
Daniel Avrahami  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Scott E. Hudson  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 5,   Downloads (12 Months): 41,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1031607.1031692
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The growing use of Instant Messaging for social and work-related communication has created a situation where incoming messages often become a distraction to users while they are performing important tasks. Staying on task at the expense of responsiveness to IM buddies may portray the users as impolite or even rude. Constantly attending to IM, on the other hand, may prevent users from performing tasks efficiently, leaving them frustrated. In this paper we present a tool that augments a commercial IM client by automatically increasing the salience of incoming messages that may deserve immediate attention, helping users decide whether or not to stay on task.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
2
 
3
Cerulean Studios http://www.trillian.cc
 
4
Clark, H.H. Arenas of Language Use. Chicago & CSLI, 1992.
 
5
Czerwinski M., Cutrell E. and Horvitz E. (2000) Instant messaging and interruption: Influence of task type on performance. In Proceedings of OZCHI '00. Academic Press, 356--361.
6
 
7
Gillie, T., and Broadbent, D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity and complexity. Psychological Research, 50, 1 (1989), 243--250.
8
9
10
11
 
12
McFarlane, D. Coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of INTERACT'99. IOS Press, Inc., 295--303.
13
14
 
15
Schegloff, E. A., and Sacks, H. Opening and Closing. Semiotica, 8 (1973), 289--327.
16
 
17
18

CITED BY  6

Collaborative Colleagues:
Daniel Avrahami: colleagues
Scott E. Hudson: colleagues