ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces
Full text PdfPdf (312 KB)
Source Computer Supported Cooperative Work archive
Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work table of contents
Chicago, Illinois, USA
SESSION: Tabletop design table of contents
Pages: 294 - 303  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-810-5
Authors
Stacey D. Scott  University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
M. Sheelagh  University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
T. Carpendale  University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
Kori M. Inkpen  Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
Sponsors
SIGCHI: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGGROUP: ACM Special Interest Group on Supporting Group Work
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 24,   Downloads (12 Months): 240,   Citation Count: 47
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1031607.1031655
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Researchers seeking alternatives to traditional desktop computers have begun exploring the potential collaborative benefits of digital tabletop displays. However, there are still many open issues related to the design of collaborative tabletop interfaces, such as whether these systems should automatically orient workspace items or enforce ownership of workspace content. Understanding the natural interaction practices that people use during tabletop collaboration with traditional media (e.g., pen and paper) can help to address these issues. Interfaces that are modeled on these practices will have the additional advantage of supporting the interaction skills people have developed over years of collaborating at traditional tables. To gain a deeper understanding of these interaction practices we conducted two observational studies of traditional tabletop collaboration in both casual and formal settings. Our results reveal that collaborators use three types of tabletop territories to help coordinate their interactions within the shared tabletop workspace: <i>personal, group</i>, and <i>storage</i> territories. Findings from a spatial analysis of collaborators' tabletop interactions reveal important properties of these tabletop territories. In order to provide a comprehensive picture of the role of tabletop territoriality in collaboration, we conclude with a synthesis of our findings and previous research findings and with several relevant design implications.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Altman, I. (1975). The Environment and Social Behavior. Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
 
2
3
4
 
5
Edney, J.J. (1976). Human territories: Comment on functional properties. Environment and Behavior, 8, pp. 31--47.
 
6
Fisher, J.D., Bell, P.A., & Baum, A. (1984). Environmental Psychology, 2nd ed. Toronto: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
7
8
 
9
McGrath, J. (1984). Groups: Interaction and Performance. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
 
10
11
12
 
13
Scott, S.D., Grant, K.D., & Mandryk, R.L. (2003). System Guidelines for Co-located, Collaborative Work on a Tabletop Display. Proc. of ECSCW'03, pp. 159--178.
 
14
Shen, C., Everitt, K.M., & Ryall, K. (2003). UbiTable: Impromptu Face-to-Face Collaboration on Horizontal Interactive Surfaces. Proc. of UbiComp'03, pp. 281--288.
15
16
 
17
Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space: The behaviour basis of design. Englewood Cliff, N.J.: Prentice - Hall.
18
19
 
20
 
21
Taylor, R. B. (1988) Human Territorial Functioning: An Empirical Evolutionary Perspective on Individual and Small Group Territorial Cognitions, Behaviors, and Consequences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22
23
24

CITED BY  47

Collaborative Colleagues:
Stacey D. Scott: colleagues
M. Sheelagh: colleagues
T. Carpendale: colleagues
Kori M. Inkpen: colleagues