Exploring the effects of group size and table size on interactions with tabletop shared-display groupware

ABSTRACT

Interactive tabletops have been previously proposed and studied in the domain of co-located group applications. However, little fundamental research has been done to explore the issue of size. In this paper we identify a number of size considerations for tabletop design, and present an experiment to explore some of these issues, in particular the effects of group size and table size on the speed at which the task was performed, the distribution of work among group members, issues of shared resources, and user preference for table size. Our findings shed light on (1) how work strategies are affected by group size, (2) how social interaction varies with respect to table size, and (3) how the speed of task performance is influenced by group size but not by table size. In addition, our experiments revealed that for larger groups, designers might need to add additional vertical displays for shared information. This finding opens the door for extending single-display groupware to shared-display groupware settings that involve multiple, shared displays.

REFERENCES

• 1: Sara A. Bly, A use of drawing surfaces in different collaborative settings, Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work, p.250-256, September 26-28, 1988, Portland, Oregon, United States [doi>10.1145/62266.62286]
• 2: Doug A. Bowman , Larry F. Hodges, An evaluation of techniques for grabbing and manipulating remote objects in immersive virtual environments, Proceedings of the 1997 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.35-ff., April 27-30, 1997, Providence, Rhode Island, United States [doi>10.1145/253284.253301]
• 3: Darley, J.M., and Latane, B., Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377--383. 1968.
• 4: Paul Dietz , Darren Leigh, DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology, Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, November 11-14, 2001, Orlando, Florida [doi>10.1145/502348.502389]
• 5: Jonathan Grudin, Partitioning digital worlds: focal and peripheral awareness in multiple monitor use, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.458-465, March 2001, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/365024.365312]
• 6: Ame Elliott , Marti A. Hearst, A comparison of the affordances of a digital desk and tablet for architectural image tasks, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.56 n.2, p.173-197, February 2002 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.2001.0520]
• 7: Hall, E.T. Distances in Man: The Hidden Dimension. Double Day, Garden City, NY.
• 8: Shahram Izadi , Harry Brignull , Tom Rodden , Yvonne Rogers , Mia Underwood, Dynamo: a public interactive surface supporting the cooperative sharing and exchange of media, Proceedings of the 16th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.159-168, November 02-05, 2003, Vancouver, Canada [doi>10.1145/964696.964714]
• 9: Brad Johanson , Armando Fox , Terry Winograd, The Interactive Workspaces Project: Experiences with Ubiquitous Computing Rooms, IEEE Pervasive Computing, v.1 n.2, p.67-74, April 2002 [doi>10.1109/MPRV.2002.1012339]
• 10: Kerr, N., Group Performance and Decision Making, Annual Review of Psychology, January 2004, Vol. 55, pp. 623--655.
• 11: Jeffrey S. Pierce , Brian C. Stearns , Randy Pausch, Voodoo dolls: seamless interaction at multiple scales in virtual environments, Proceedings of the 1999 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, p.141-145, April 26-29, 1999, Atlanta, Georgia, United States [doi>10.1145/300523.300540]
• 12: Ivan Poupyrev , Mark Billinghurst , Suzanne Weghorst , Tadao Ichikawa, The go-go interaction technique: non-linear mapping for direct manipulation in VR, Proceedings of the 9th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, p.79-80, November 06-08, 1996, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/237091.237102]
• 13: Jun Rekimoto, SmartSkin: an infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/503376.503397]
• 14: Jun Rekimoto , Masanori Saitoh, Augmented surfaces: a spatially continuous work space for hybrid computing environments, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.378-385, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.303113]
• 15: Yvonne Rogers , William Hazlewood , Eli Blevis , Youn-Kyung Lim, Finger talk: collaborative decision-making using talk and fingertip interaction around a tabletop display, CHI '04 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985921.986041]
• 16: Daniel M. Russell , Clemens Drews , Alison Sue, Social Aspects of Using Large Public Interactive Displays for Collaboration, Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Ubiquitous Computing, p.229-236, September 29-October 01, 2002, Göteborg, Sweden
• 17: Scott, S.D., Grant, K.D., and Mandryk, R.L. System Guidelines for Co-located Collaborative Work on a Tabletop Display. Proc. ECSCW 2003, 159--178.
• 18: Stacey D. Scott , M. Sheelagh , T. Carpendale , Kori M. Inkpen, Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces, Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, November 06-10, 2004, Chicago, Illinois, USA [doi>10.1145/1031607.1031655]
• 19: Shen, C., Everitt, K., and Ryall, K. UbiTable: Impromptu Face-to-Face Collaboration on Horizontal Interactive Surfaces. Proc. UbiComp 2003, 218--288.
• 20: Chia Shen , Frédéric D. Vernier , Clifton Forlines , Meredith Ringel, DiamondSpin: an extensible toolkit for around-the-table interaction, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.167-174, April 24-29, 2004, Vienna, Austria [doi>10.1145/985692.985714]
• 21: Garth B. D. Shoemaker , Kori M. Inkpen, Single display privacyware: augmenting public displays with private information, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.522-529, March 2001, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/365024.365349]
• 22: SMART Technologies. "Digital Vision Touch Technology." White Paper, February 2003. http://www.smarttech.com/dvit/DViT_white_paper.pdf.
• 23: Sommer, R. Personal Space: The Behaviour Basis of Design. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J. 1969.
• 24: Steiner, I. (1972). Group Process and Productivity, New York, NY: Academic Press.
• 25: Jason Stewart , Benjamin B. Bederson , Allison Druin, Single display groupware: a model for co-present collaboration, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: the CHI is the limit, p.286-293, May 15-20, 1999, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States [doi>10.1145/302979.303064]
• 26: Streitz, N.A., Tandler, P., Müller-Tomfelde, C., and Konomi, S. Roomware. Towards the Next Generation of Human-Computer Interaction based on an Integrated Design of Real and Virtual Worlds. In: J. A. Carroll (Ed.): Human-Computer Interaction in the New Millennium, Addison Wesley (2001), 553--578.
• 27: Peter Tandler , Thorsten Prante , Christian Müller-Tomfelde , Norbert Streitz , Ralf Steinmetz, Connectables: dynamic coupling of displays for the flexible creation of shared workspaces, Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, November 11-14, 2001, Orlando, Florida [doi>10.1145/502348.502351]
• 28: John C. Tang, Findings from observational studies of collaborative work, International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, v.34 n.2, p.143-160, Feb. 1991 [doi>10.1016/0020-7373(91)90039-A]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.3 Group and Organization Interfaces

General Terms:
Design, Experimentation, Human Factors

Keywords:
multi-user interfaces, shared-display groupware, tabletop interfaces