ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements
Full text PdfPdf (404 KB)
Source Conference On Embedded Networked Sensor Systems archive
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems table of contents
Baltimore, MD, USA
SESSION: Localization and timesynch table of contents
Pages: 50 - 61  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-879-2
Authors
David Moore  MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
John Leonard  MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Daniela Rus  MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Seth Teller  MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Sponsors
SIGARCH: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Architecture
SIGBED: ACM Special Interest Group on Embedded Systems
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
SIGMETRICS: ACM Special Interest Group on Measurement and Evaluation
SIGOPS: ACM Special Interest Group on Operating Systems
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 33,   Downloads (12 Months): 273,   Citation Count: 56
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1031495.1031502
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a distributed, linear-time algorithm for localizing sensor network nodes in the presence of range measurement noise and demonstrates the algorithm on a physical network. We introduce the probabilistic notion of robust quadrilaterals as a way to avoid flip ambiguities that otherwise corrupt localization computations. We formulate the localization problem as a two-dimensional graph realization problem: given a planar graph with approximately known edge lengths, recover the Euclidean position of each vertex up to a global rotation and translation. This formulation is applicable to the localization of sensor networks in which each node can estimate the distance to each of its neighbors, but no absolute position reference such as GPS or fixed anchor nodes is available.

We implemented the algorithm on a physical sensor network and empirically assessed its accuracy and performance. Also, in simulation, we demonstrate that the algorithm scales to large networks and handles real-world deployment geometries. Finally, we show how the algorithm supports localization of mobile nodes.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bulusu, N., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. GPS-less low cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine 7, 5 (October 2000), 28-34.
 
2
 
3
Doherty, L., Pister, K. S. J., and Ghaoui, L. E. Convex position estimation in wireless sensor networks. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM (Anchorage, AK, April 2001).
 
4
Eren, T., Goldenberg, D., Whiteley, W., Yang, Y. R., Morse, A. S., Anderson, B. D. O., and Belhumeur, P. N. Rigidity, computation, and randomization in network localization. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM (March 2004).
5
 
6
Grabowski, R., and Khosla, P. Localization techniques for a team of small robots. In Proc. IEEE IROS (Maui, Hawaii, October 2001).
 
7
 
8
Horn, B. K. P. Closed form solution of absolute orientation using unit quaternions. Journal of the Optical Society A 4, 4 (April 1987), 629--642.
 
9
Ji, X., and Zha, H. Sensor positioning in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks using multidimensional scaling. In Proc. IEEE INFOCOM (March 2004).
 
10
Laman, G. On graphs and rigidity of plane skeletal structures. J. Engineering Math 4 (1970), 331--340.
 
11
Nagpal, R., Shrobe, H., and Bachrach, J. Organizing a global coordinate system from local information on an ad hoc sensor network. In Proc. IPSN (Palo Alto, CA, April 2003), pp. 333--348.
 
12
Niculescu, D., and Nath, B. DV based positioning in ad hoc networks. Kluwer journal of Telecommunication Systems (2003), 267--280.
13
 
14
Patwari, N., III, A. O. H., Perkins, M., Correal, N. S., and O'Dea, R. J. Relative location estimation in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 51, 8 (August 2003), 2137--2148.
 
15
Priyantha, N. B., Balakrishnan, H., Demaine, E., and Teller, S. Anchor-free distributed localization in sensor networks. Tech. Rep. 892, MIT Lab. for Comp. Sci., April 2003.
16
 
17
 
18
Savvides, A., Garber, W., Adlakha, S., Moses, R., and Srivastava, M. B. On the error characteristics of multihop node localization in ad-hoc sensor networks. In Proc. IPSN (Palo Alto, CA, April 2003), pp. 317--332.
19
 
20
Saxe, J. B. Embeddability of weighted graphs in k-space is strongly NP-hard. In Proc. 17th Allerton Conf. Commun. Control Comput. (1979), pp. 480--489.
 
21
Simic, S. N., and Sastry, S. Distributed localization in wireless ad hoc networks. Tech. Rep. UCB/ERL M02/26, UC Berkeley, December 2001.
22
 
23

CITED BY  57

Collaborative Colleagues:
David Moore: colleagues
John Leonard: colleagues
Daniela Rus: colleagues
Seth Teller: colleagues