ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Market-based recommendation: Agents that compete for consumer attention
Full text PdfPdf (616 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) archive
Volume 4 ,  Issue 4  (November 2004) table of contents
Pages: 420 - 448  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:1533-5399
Authors
Sander M. Bohte  The Netherlands Center for Mathematics and Computer Science (CWI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Enrico Gerding  The Netherlands Center for Mathematics and Computer Science (CWI), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Han La Poutré  The Netherlands Center for Mathematics and Computer Science (CWI), and Eindhoven University of Technology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 15,   Downloads (12 Months): 131,   Citation Count: 12
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1031114.1031118
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The amount of attention space available for recommending suppliers to consumers on e-commerce sites is typically limited. We present a competitive distributed recommendation mechanism based on adaptive software agents for efficiently allocating the "consumer attention space," or banners. In the example of an electronic shopping mall, the task is delegated to the individual shops, each of which evaluates the information that is available about the consumer and his or her interests (e.g. keywords, product queries, and available parts of a profile). Shops make a monetary bid in an auction where a limited amount of "consumer attention space" for the arriving consumer is sold. Each shop is represented by a software agent that bids for each consumer. This allows shops to rapidly adapt their bidding strategy to focus on consumers interested in their offerings.

For various basic and simple models for on-line consumers, shops, and profiles, we demonstrate the feasibility of our system by evolutionary simulations as in the field of agent-based computational economics (ACE). We also develop adaptive software agents that learn bidding-strategies, based on neural networks and strategy exploration heuristics. Furthermore, we address the commercial and technological advantages of this distributed market-based approach. The mechanism we describe is not limited to the example of the electronic shopping mall, but can easily be extended to other domains.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
Blattberg, R. and Deighton, J. 1991. Interactive marketing: Exploiting the age of addressability. Sloan Manage. Rev. 33, 5--14.
 
4
Bohte, S. M., Gerding, E., and La Poutré, H. 2001a. Competitive market-based allocation of consumer attention space. Tech. Rep. SEN-R0131, CWI, Amsterdam.
5
 
6
Bohte, S. M, Kok, J., and La Poutré, H. 2002. Spike-prop: error-backpropagation in multi-layer networks of spiking neurons. Neurocomputing 48, 1--4 (October), 17--37.
 
7
 
8
Chircu, A. M. and Kauffman, R. J. 1999. Strategies for internet middlemen in the intermediation/disintermediation/reintermediation cycle. Electronic Markets 9, 2, 109--117.
 
9
Clearwater, S., Ed. 1995. Market based Control of Distributed Systems. World Scientific Press, Singapore.
 
10
Dasgupta, P. and Maskin, E. 2000. Efficient auctions. The Quarterly J. Econ. 115, 341--388.
 
11
Gellmann, R. 1996. Disintermediation and the internet. Gov. Info. Quarterly 13, 1, 1--8.
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
Haeckel, S. 1998. About the nature and future of interactive marketing. J. Interactive Marketing 12, 63--71.
 
18
Heskes, T. 1997. Practical confidence and prediction intervals. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, M. C. Mozer, M. I. Jordan, and R. Petsche, Eds. Vol. 9. The MIT Press, 176--183.
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
Kirman, A. and Vriend, N. 2001. Evolving market structure: An ACE model of price dispersion and loyalty. J. Dynam. Cont. 25, 459--502.
 
25
 
26
Krulwich, B. 1996. The BargainFinder agent: Comparison price shopping on the internet. In Agents, Bots and Other Internet Beasties, J. Williams, Ed. SAMS.NET publishing.
 
27
 
28
 
29
Montgomery, A. and Srinivasan, K. 2002. Learning about customers without asking. In The Power of One-Leverage Value from Personalization Technologies, N. Pal and A. Rangaswamy, Eds. eBRC Press, Penn State University.
 
30
Moreau, L., Zaini, N., Zhou, J., Jennings, N. R., Wei, Y. Z., Hall, W., de Roure, D., Gilchrist, I., ODell, M., Reich, S., Berka, T., and di Napoli, C. 2002. A market-based recommender system. In Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Agent-Oriented Information Systems, Bologna, Italy. 50--67.
 
31
Moukas, A., Guttman, R., and Maes, P. 1998. Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce: An MIT Media Laboratory Perspective. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Electronic Commerce, Seoul, Korea.
 
32
Nissen, M. 2000. Agent-based supply chain disintermediation versus re-intermeditation: Economic and technological perspectives. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Accounting, Finance and Management 9, 237--256.
 
33
 
34
 
35
Peppers, D., Rogers, M., and Dorf, B. 1999. Is your company ready for one-to-one marketing? Harvard Bus. Rev. 77, 151--162.
36
 
37
 
38
 
39
 
40
Tesfatsion, L. 2001. Introduction to the special issue on agent-based computational economics. J. Econom. Dynam. Cont. 25, 3/4, 281--293.
 
41
 
42
Van Bragt, D. and La Poutré, H. 2001. Generating efficient automata for negotiations---an exploration with evolutionary algorithms. In Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECKO-2001), San Francisco, July 2001.
 
43
 
44
Varian, H. 1995. Economic mechanism design for computerized agents. In First USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce. New York, 13--21.
 
45
Vermeer, B. 2001. Data Quality and Data Alignment in E-Business. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology.
 
46
Vickrey, W. 1961. Counterspeculation, auctions and competitive sealed tenders. J. Finance 16, 8--37.
 
47
 
48

CITED BY  12

Collaborative Colleagues:
Sander M. Bohte: colleagues
Enrico Gerding: colleagues
Han La Poutré: colleagues