ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Simulation test bed for manufacturing analysis: benchmarking of a stochastic production planning model in a simulation testbed
Full text PdfPdf (237 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 35th conference on Winter simulation: driving innovation table of contents
New Orleans, Louisiana
SESSION: Manufacturing applications table of contents
Pages: 1183 - 1191  
Year of Publication: 2003
ISBN:0-7803-8132-7
Authors
Germán Riaño  Universidad de los Andes, Carrera Bogotá, D.C., Colombia
Richard Serfozo  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Steven Hackman  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Szu Hui Ng  National University of Singapore, Singapore
Lai Peng Chan  Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Singapore
Peter Lendermann  Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Singapore
Sponsors
INFORMS/CS : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences/College on Simulation
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
IEEE/SMCS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
(SCS) : The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
IEEE/CS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Computer Society
ASA : American Statistical Association
Publisher
Winter Simulation Conference 
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 25,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

A major problem in production planning is to determine when to release products into production to meet forecasted requirements. Recently, Riaño et al. (2002) proposed the <i>Stochastic Production Planning</i> (SPP) model for a multi-period, multi-product system, where the lead time to produce a product may be random. The model determines release times for the products that ensure the requirements in each time period are met with desired probabilities at a minimum cost. This paper describes how an advanced planning model like SPP can be integrated with discrete event simulation models to make the simulations more realistic and informative. This paper also compares the performance of the SPP model with the classical MRP (materials requirements planning) model, and with a stochastic variation of the MRP model in a simulation study. The costs associated with the production plans from SPP are about 10% less than the costs from the other two models.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Baker, K. R. 1993. Requirements planning. Handbooks in OR & MS. eds. S. C. Gravel et al. 4:571--627.
 
2
Buzacott, J. A., S. M. Price, and J. G. Shanthikumar. 1992. Service level in multistage MRP and base stock controlled production systems. New Directions for Operations Research in Manufacturing System. eds. Fandel, T., Gulledge, T., and A. Jones, Springer-Verlag, 445--463.
 
3
Buzacott, J. A., and G. J. Shanthikumar. 1993. Stochastic Models of Manufacturing Systems. UK: Prentice-Hall.
 
4
Elliot, M. 2000. Buyer's guide: Advanced planning and scheduling software. IIE Solutions Oct:48--56.
 
5
Gumaer, R. 1996. Beyond ERP and MRP II: Optimized planning and synchronized manufacturing. IIE Solutions September:32--35.
 
6
 
7
Kawai, R. 2002. Poisson approximations. Directed-Study Notes. Georgia Institute of Technology.
 
8
Leachman, R. C., R. F. Benson, and D. K. Raar. 1996. IMPReSS: An automated production-planning and delivery-quotation system at Harris Corporation --- Semiconductor Sector. INTERFACES 26:6--26.
 
9
Lendermann, P., N. Julka, B. P. Gan, and L. F. McGinnis. 2002. Framework for distributed supply chain simulation: Technical feasibility and implementation approaches for the semiconductor industry. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Modeling and Analysis of Semiconductor Manufacturing. (MASM 2002)
 
10
McDonald, D. 1989. On nonhomogeneous, spatial Poisson processes. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 17:183--195.
 
11
Riaño, G. 2002. Transient Behavior of Stochastic Networks: An Application to Production Planning. Ph. D. thesis, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
 
12
Riaño, G., R. F. Serfozo, S. T. Hackman, S. H. Ng, and L. P. Chan. 2002. A Stochastic Production Planning Model. Technical report, National University of Singapore.
 
13
Sculli, D., and S. Y. Wu. 1981. Stock Control with Two Suppliers and Normal Lead Times. Journal of the Operational Research Society 32:1003--1009.
 
14
Serfozo, R. F 1990. Point processes. In Stochastic Models. eds. Heyman, D. P. and M. J. Sobel, Elsevier Science/North Holland, Amsterdam, 1--93.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Germán Riaño: colleagues
Richard Serfozo: colleagues
Steven Hackman: colleagues
Szu Hui Ng: colleagues
Lai Peng Chan: colleagues
Peter Lendermann: colleagues