|
ABSTRACT
In this paper we discuss verification and validation of simulation models. Four different approaches to deciding model validity are described; two different paradigms that relate verification and validation to the model development process are presented; various validation techniques are defined; conceptual model validity, model verification, operational validity, and data validity are discussed; a way to document results is given; a recommended procedure for model validation is presented; and accreditation is briefly discussed.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Anderson, H. A. and R. G. Sargent. 1974. An investigation into scheduling for an interactive computer system. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 18 (2): 125--137.
|
 |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
Osman Balci, Verification, validation, and accreditation, Proceedings of the 30th conference on Winter simulation, p.41-4, December 13-16, 1998, Washington, D.C., United States
|
 |
4
|
|
| |
5
|
Balci, O. and R. G. Sargent. 1982a. Validation of multivariate response simulation models by using Hotelling's two-sample T2 test. Simulation 39(6):185--192.
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
Balci, O. and R. G. Sargent. 1984a. A bibliography on the credibility assessment and validation of simulation and mathematical models. Simuletter 15(3):15--27.
|
| |
9
|
Balci, O. and R. G. Sargent. 1984b. Validation of simulation models via simultaneous confidence intervals. American Journal of Mathematical and Management Science 4(3):375--406.
|
| |
10
|
Banks, J., J. S. Carson II, B. L. Nelson, and D. Nicol. 2000. Discrete-event system simulaton. 3d. Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
|
| |
11
|
Banks, J., D. Gerstein, and S. P. Searles. 1988. Modeling Processes, Validation, and Verification of Complex Simulations: A Survey. In Methodology and Validation, Simulation Series, Vol. 19, No. 1, The Society for Computer Simulation, 13--18. San Diego, CA: Society for Modeling and Simulation International.
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
DOD simulations: improved assessment procedures would increase the credibility of results. 1987. U. S. General Accounting Office, PEMD-88--3.
|
| |
14
|
Fairley, R. E. 1976. Dynamic testing of simulation software. In Proc. 1976 Summer Computer Simulation Conf., 40--46, Washington, D.C.
|
| |
15
|
Gass, S. I. 1983. Decision-aiding models: validation, assessment, and related issues for policy analysis. Operations Research 31(4):601--663.
|
| |
16
|
Gass, S. I. 1984. Documenting a computer-based model. Interfaces, 14(3):84--93.
|
| |
17
|
Gass, S. I. 1993. Model Accreditation: A Rationale and Process for Determining a Numerical Rating. European Journal of Operational Research, 66 (2): 250--258.
|
| |
18
|
Gass, S. I. and L. Joel. 1987. Concepts of Model Confidence. Computers and Operations Research, 8 (4): 341--346.
|
| |
19
|
Gass, S. I. And B. W. Thompson. 1980. Guidelines for model evaluation: An abridged version of the U. S. general accounting office exposure draft. Operations Research 28(2):431--479.
|
| |
20
|
|
| |
21
|
|
 |
22
|
|
 |
23
|
|
| |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
|
| |
26
|
|
| |
27
|
|
| |
28
|
Nayor, T. H. and J. M. Finger. 1967. Verification of computer simulation models. Management Science 14(2):B92-B101.
|
 |
29
|
|
| |
30
|
Rao, M. J. and R. G. Sargent. 1988. An advisory system for operational validity. In Artificial Intelligence and Simulation: the Diversity of Applications, ed. T. Hensen, 245--250. San Diego, CA: Society for Computer Simulation.
|
| |
31
|
|
| |
32
|
Sargent, R. G. 1981. An assessment procedure and a set of criteria for use in the evaluation of computerized models and computer-based modeling tools. Final Technical Report RADC-TR-80--409.
|
| |
33
|
Sargent, R. G. 1982. Verification and Validation of Simulation Models. Chapter IX in Progress in Modelling and Simulation, ed. F. E. Cellier, 159--169. London: Academic Press.
|
| |
34
|
Sargent, R. G. 1984. Simulation Model Validation. Chapter 19 in Simulation and Model-Based Methodologies: An Integrative View, ed. T. I. Oren, B. P. Zeigler, and M. S. Elzas, 537--555. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
|
 |
35
|
|
 |
36
|
|
| |
37
|
Sargent, R. G. 1990. Validation of mathematical models. In Proc. of Geoval-90: Symposium on Validation of Geosphere Flow and Transport Models, 571--579. Stockholm, Sweden.
|
| |
38
|
|
| |
39
|
|
| |
40
|
|
| |
41
|
Robert G. Sargent, Verification, validation, and accreditation: verification, validation, and accreditation of simulation models, Proceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation, December 10-13, 2000, Orlando, Florida
|
| |
42
|
Sargent, R. G. 2001a. Graphical displays of simulation model data as statistical references. In Simulation 2001 (Proc. of the 4th St. Petersburg Workshop on Simulation), ed. S. M. Ermakor, Yu. N. Kashtanov, and V. B. Melas, 109--118. Publisher: Chemistry Research Institute of St. Petersburg University.
|
| |
43
|
|
| |
44
|
Schlesinger, et al. 1979. Terminology for model credibility. Simulation, 32(3):103--104.
|
| |
45
|
Schruben, L. W. 1980. Establishing the credibility of simulation models. Simulation 34(3):101--105.
|
 |
46
|
|
 |
47
|
|
| |
48
|
|
CITED BY 11
|
|
|
|
|
David Joiner , Steven Gordon , Scott Lathrop , Marilyn McClelland , D. E. Stevenson, Applying verification, validation, and accreditation processes to digital libraries, Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, June 07-11, 2005, Denver, CO, USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huaqiang Wei , Jim Alves-Foss , Terrence Soule , Hugh Pforsich , Du Zhang , Deborah Frincke, A Layered Decision Model for cost-effective system security, International Journal of Information and Computer Security, v.2 n.3, p.297-324, October 2008
|
|