ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Supply chain planning: using simulation to evaluate buffer adjustment methods in order promising
Full text PdfPdf (285 KB)
Source Winter Simulation Conference archive
Proceedings of the 34th conference on Winter simulation: exploring new frontiers table of contents
San Diego, California
SESSION: Simulation-based scheduling table of contents
Pages: 1838 - 1845  
Year of Publication: 2002
ISBN:0-7803-7615-3
Authors
Hank Grant  University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Scott Moses  University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Dave Goldsman  Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
Sponsors
IEEE/CS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Computer Society
ASA : American Statistical Association
IEEE/SMCS : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers/Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society
INFORMS/CS : Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences/College on Simulation
NIST : National Institute of Standards and Technology
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
(SCS) : The Society for Modeling and Simulation International
SIGSIM: ACM Special Interest Group on Simulation and Modeling
IIE : Institute of Industrial Engineers
Publisher
Winter Simulation Conference 
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  

ABSTRACT

Much literature exists for scheduling production, but there is little work on establishing the due dates that serve as the inputs to developing a production schedule. We call this Order Promising. This paper explores a simulation-based approach for evaluating methods for promising the delivery of orders based on dynamic buffer adjustment coupled with various methods to forecast the amount of buffer required. The primary objective of the paper is to frame the problem and suggest methods of analysis. Preliminary computational results are also presented.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
 
3
Baker, K. R. and J. W. M. Bertrand. 1981. An Investigation of Due-Date Assignment Rules with Constrained Tightness, Journal of Operations Management, 1 (3), 109--120.
 
4
Bertrand, J. W. M. 1983. The Effect of Workload Dependent Due-Dates on Job Shop Performance, Management Science, 29 (7), 799--816.
 
5
 
6
Chen, Z. L. 1996. Scheduling and Common Due Date Assignment with Earliness-Tardiness Penalties and Batch Delivery Costs, European Journal of Operational Research, 93, 49--60.
 
7
Cheng, T. C. E. 1986. Optimal Due-Date Assignment in a Job Shop, International Journal of Production Research, 24 (3), 503--515.
 
8
Cheng, T. C. E. 1987. Optimal TWK-Power Due-Date Determination and Sequencing, International Journal of Systems Sciences, 18 (1), 1--7.
 
9
Cheng, T. C. E. 1988. Integration of Priority Dispatching and Due-Date Assignment in a Job Shop, International Journal of Systems Science, 19 (9), 1813--1825.
 
10
Cheng, T. C. E. and M. C. Gupta. 1989. Survey of Scheduling Research Involving Due Date Determination Decisions, European Journal of Operational Research, 38, 156--166.
 
11
Cheng, T. C. E. 1991. Optimal Assignment of Total-Work-Content Due-Dates and Sequencing in a Single-Machine Shop, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 42, 177--181.
 
12
Cheng, T. C. E., C. Oguz, and X. D. Qi. 1996. Due-Date Assignment and Single Machine Scheduling with Compressible Processing Times, International Journal of Production Economics, 43, 107--113.
 
13
Conway, R. W. 1965. Priority Dispatching and Job Lateness in a Job Shop, Journal of Industrial Engineering, 16 (4), 228--237.
 
14
De, P., J. B. Ghosh, and C. E. Wells 1992. Optimal Due-Date Assignment and Sequencing, European Journal of Operational Research, 57, 323--331.
 
15
De, P., J. B. Ghosh, and C. E. Wells, C. E. 1994a. Due-Date Assignment and Early/Tardy Scheduling on Identical Parallel Machines, Naval Research Logistics, 41 (1), 17--32.
 
16
De, P., Ghosh, J. B., and Wells, C. E. 1994b. Solving a Generalized Model for CON Due Date Assignment and Sequencing, International Journal of Production Economics, 34, 179--185.
 
17
 
18
 
19
Eilon, S. E. and I. G. Chowdhury, 1976. Due Dates in Job Shop Scheduling, International Journal of Production Research, 14 (2), 223--237.
 
20
Gruenwald, L., and J. Cheng. 1997. A Logging Technique Based on Transaction Types for Real-Time Databases, Real-Time Database and Information Systems-Research Advances, Editors Azer Bestavros and Victor Fay-Wolfe, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 379--392,
21
 
22
Heard, E. L. 1976. Due-Dates and Instantaneous Load in the One-Machine Shop, Management Science, 23 (4), 444--450.
 
23
Hopp, W. J. and M. L. Roof Sturgis. 2000. Quoting Manufacturing Due Dates Subject to a Service Level Constraint, IIE Transactions, 32 (9), 771--784.
 
24
Kaplan, A. C. and A. T. Unal. 1993. A Probabilistic Cost-Based Due Date Assignment Model for Job Shops, International Journal of Production Research, 31 (12), 2817--2834.
 
25
Lawrence, S. R. 1995. Estimating Flowtimes and Setting Due-Dates in Complex Production Systems, IIE Transactions, 27, 657--668.
 
26
Li, C. L and T. C. E. Cheng. 1999. Due Date Determination with Resequencing, IIE Transactions, 31 (2), 183--188.
 
27
Luss, H. and M. B. Rosenwein. 1993. A Due Date Assignment Algorithm for Multiproduct Manufacturing Facilities, European Journal of Operational Research, 65, 187--198.
 
28
Palaka, K., S. Erlebacher, and D. H. Kropp. 1998. Lead-Time Setting, Capacity Utilization, and Pricing Decisions Under Lead-Time Dependent Demand, IEE Transactions, 30, 151--163.
 
29
 
30
Ragatz, G. L. and V. A. Mabert. 1984a. A Framework for the Study of Due Date Management in Job Shops, International Journal of Production Research, 22 (4), 685--695.
 
31
Ragatz, G. L. and V. A. Mabert. 1984b. A Simulation Analysis of Due Date Assignment Rules, Journal of Operations Management, 5 (1), 27--39.
 
32
Raghu, T. S. and V. Rajendran. 1995. Due-Date Setting Methodologies Based on Simulated Annealing---An Experimental Study in a Real-Life Job Shop, International Journal of Production Research, 33 (9), 2535--2554.
 
33
Rajasekera, J. R., M. R. Murr, and K. C. So. 1991. A Due-Date Assignment Model for a Flow Shop with Application in a Lightguide Cable Shop, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 10 (1), 1--7.
 
34
Seidmann, A. and M. L. Smith. 1981. Due Date Assignment for Production Systems, Management Science, 27 (5), 571--581.
 
35
Shanthikumar, J. G. and U. Sumita. 1988. Approximations for the Time Spent in a Dynamic Job Shop with Applications to Due-Date Assignment, International Journal of Production Research, 26 (8), 1329--1352.
 
36
Smith, M. L. and A. Seidmann. 1983. Due Date Selection Procedures for Job-Shop Simulation, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 7 (3), 199--207.
 
37
Tsai, C. H., G. T. Chang, and R. T. Li. 1997. Integrating Order Release Control with Due-Date Assignment Rules, International Journal of Production Research, 35 (12), 3379--3392.
 
38
Udo, G. 1993. An Investigation of Due-Date Assignment Using Workload Information of a Dynamic Shop, International Journal of Production Economics, 29, 89--101.
 
39
Vig, M. M. and K. J. Dooley. 1991. Dynamic Rules for Due-Date Assignment, International Journal of Production Research, 29 (7), 1361--1377.
 
40
Vig, M. M. and K. J. Dooley. 1993. Mixing Static and Dynamic Flowtime Estimates for Due-Date Assignment, Journal of Operations Management, 11, 67--79.
 
41
Weeks, J. K. 1979. A Simulation Study of Predictable Due-Dates, Management Science, 25 (4), 363--373.
 
42
 
43
 
44
Weng, Z. K. 1999. Strategies for Integrating Lead Time and Customer-Order Decisions, IIE Transactions, 31 (2), 161--171.
 
45

Collaborative Colleagues:
Hank Grant: colleagues
Scott Moses: colleagues
Dave Goldsman: colleagues