ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
k-anonymous secret handshakes with reusable credentials
Full text PdfPdf (252 KB)
Source Conference on Computer and Communications Security archive
Proceedings of the 11th ACM conference on Computer and communications security table of contents
Washington DC, USA
SESSION: Credentials table of contents
Pages: 158 - 167  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-961-6
Authors
Shouhuai Xu  University of Texas at San Antonio
Moti Yung  Columbia University
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 11,   Downloads (12 Months): 70,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1030083.1030105
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The problem of privacy-preserving authentication has been extensively investigated in a set of diverse system settings. However, a full-fledged such mechanism called secret handshake, whereby two users (e.g., CIA agents) authenticate each other in a way that no one reveals its own membership (or credential) unless the peer's legitimacy was already ensured of, remains to be elusive because simultaneity of authentication must be guaranteed even in the presence of an active adversary that may act as a handshake initiator or responder. The state-of-the-art secret handshake scheme is very efficient, but imposes on the users the following restriction: either they have to use one-time credentials, or they have to suffer from the privacy degradation that all the sessions involving a same user (or credential are trivially linkable. In this paper, we present the first secret handshake schemes that achieve unlinkability while allowing the users to reuse their credentials (i.e., unlinkability is not achieved by means of one-time credentials). Specifically, we introduce the concept of $k$-anonymous secret handshakes where $k$ is an adjustable parameter indicating the desired anonymity assurance. We present a detailed construction based on public key cryptosystems, and sketch another based on symmetric key cryptosystems. Both schemes are efficient, and can even be seamlessly integrated into a standard public key infrastructure (PKI). Moreover, and their security analysis does not resort to any random oracle.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
M. Abadi. Private authentication. In Proceedings of the 2002 Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, pages 27--40, 2003.
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
M. Bellare and P. Rogaway. Optimal asymmetric encryption. In A. D. Santis, editor, EUROCRYPT94, pages 92--111. Springer, 1995. Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 950.
 
6
 
7
 
8
C. Boyd, W. Mao, and K. Paterson. Deniable authenticated key establishment for internet protocols. In the Proceedings of Security Protocols, 2003.
 
9
C. Castelluccia, S. Jarecki, and G. Tsudik. Secret handshakes from ca-oblivious encryption. In P. Lee, editor, Advances in Cryptology - ASIACRYPT 2004, volume ??? of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages ???--??? Springer, 2004.
 
10
D. Chaum. Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In R. L. Rivest, A. Sherman, and D. Chaum, editors, Proc. CRYPTO 82, pages 199--203, New York, 1983. Plenum Press.
 
11
D. Chaum and E. V. Heyst. Group signatures. In D. W. Davies, editor, Advances in Cryptology --- Eurocrypt '91, pages 257--265, Berlin, 1991. Springer-Verlag. Lecture Notes in Computer Science No. 547.
 
12
 
13
 
14
W. Diffie and M. E. Hellman. New directions in cryptography. IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, IT-22:644--654, Nov. 1976.
15
 
16
17
 
18
 
19
D. Harkins and D. Carrel. RFC 2409: The Internet Key Exchange (IKE). Internet Activities Board, 1998.
20
 
21
M. Jakobsson, K. Sako, and R. Impagliazzo. Designated verifier proofs and their applications. In Proc. EUROCRYPT 96, pages 143--154.
 
22
H. Krawczyk. Sigma: The 'sign-and-mac' approach to authenticated diffie-hellman and its use in the ike-protocols. In D. Boneh, editor, Proc. CRYPTO 2003, volume 2729 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 400--425. Springer-Verlag, 2002.
23
 
24
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
R. Sakai, K. Ohgishi, and M. Kasahara. Cryptosystems based on pairing. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Cryptography and Information Security (SCIS), 2002.
 
29
30
 
31
S. Xu and M. Yung. k-anonymous secret handshakes with reusable credentials. Full version of the present paper.