ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Theory adapters as discipline coordinators
Full text PdfPdf (178 KB)
Source Foundations of Software Engineering archive
Proceedings of the 2004 ACM workshop on Interdisciplinary software engineering research table of contents
Newport Beach, CA, USA
SESSION: Introduction and general issues table of contents
Pages: 8 - 17  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-988-8
Author
Andrew Walenstein  University of Louisiana at Lafayette
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 1,   Downloads (12 Months): 24,   Citation Count: 3
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1029997.1030001
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A successful discipline of software engineering will, over time, incorporate within its own borders those theories and techniques from other disciplines which are relevant in and helpful to software development. Since both software engineering and its cognate disciplines will change over time, it must not only incorporate external theories and techniques, but establish active coordination with other disciplines. Having explicit models and plans for achieving this coordination is preferable to leaving it to chance. This paper outlines a model for coordinating software engineering and cognitive support research through theory transfer by applied theoreticians. Ongoing work on incorporating cognitive support theories into software engineering processes and education are cast as an example effort falling under this discipline coordination model. The model is conservative in that it does not suggest a radical transformation of software engineering, but our application to cognitive support does highlight a need for more directed theory application, and generates proposals for non-trivial additions to the accepted body of knowledge.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Anderson, J. R. Methodologies for studying human knowledge. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 10 (1987), 467--505.
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
Card, S. K., Pavel, M., and Farrell, J. E. Window-based computer dialogues. In Proceedings of IFIP INTERACT'84: Human-Computer Interaction (1984), B. Shackel, Ed., IFIP, North-Holland, pp. 239--243.
 
6
 
7
Green, T. R. G., Davies, S. P., and Gilmore, D. J. Delivering cognitive psychology to HCI: the problems of common language and knowledge transfer. Interacting With Computers 8, 1 (1996), 89--11.
8
 
9
 
10
John, B. E., and Bass, L. Usability and software architecture. Behaviour and Information Technology 20, 5 (2001), 329--338.
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
16
 
17
Walenstein, A. Cognitive Support in Software Engineering Tools: A Distributed Cognition Framework. PhD thesis, School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, May 2002.
 
18
 
19
 
20
Walenstein, A. Finding boundary objects in SE and HCI: An approach through engineering-oriented design theories. In Bridging the Gaps Between Software Engineering and Human-Computer Interaction (2003), IFIP WG 2.7/13.4, pp. 92--99.
 
21
Walenstein, A. Improving adoptability by preserving, leveraging, and adding cognitive support to existing tools and environments. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Adoption-Centric Software Engineerin (2003), R. Balzer, J.-H. Jahnke, M. Litoiu, H. A. M&3252;ller, D. B. Smith, M.-A. Storey, S. R. Tilley, K. Wong, and A. Weber, Eds., pp. 36--41. Published by the Software Engineering Institute as Tech Report CMU/SEI-2003-SR-004.
 
22
 
23
Wright, P. C., Fields, R. E., and Harrison, M. D. Analyzing human--computer interaction as distributed cognition: The resources model. Human Computer Interaction 15, 1 (Mar. 2000), 1--41.
24
 
25