ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Specification and managed development of information technology curricula
Full text PdfPdf (174 KB)
Source Conference On Information Technology Education (formerly CITC) archive
Proceedings of the 5th conference on Information technology education table of contents
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
SESSION: The academic environment table of contents
Pages: 261 - 266  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-936-5
Authors
Kenneth L. Alford  United States Military Academy, West Point, NY
Curtis A. Carter  United States Military Academy, West Point, NY
Daniel J. Ragsdale  United States Military Academy, West Point, NY
Eugene K. Ressler  United States Military Academy, West Point, NY
Charles W. Reynolds  United States Military Academy, West Point, NY
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 6,   Downloads (12 Months): 35,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1029533.1029598
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The Information Technology (IT) movement in higher education has been growing over several years, leading to a draft ACM CC2004 report that defines Information Technology in relation to other computing disciplines and a draft ABET/CAC accreditation standard that calls for documented educational objectives. As yet, there is no authoritative agreement on educational objectives for Information Technology. While proposing an Information Technology (IT) definition and objectives that compares Information Technology graduates with Computer Science (CS) graduates, this paper more significantly proposes a framework in which dialog about educational objectives can occur. This framework is based on identifying objectives by first identifying recurring concepts we wish to teach and then outlining essential questions and uncovering projects that teach the recurring concepts. This paper then continues by proposing a curricular development methodology based on the use of three-course threads that combine to reveal the previously identified recurring concepts. The significance of this methodology to an academic unit considering implementing an Information Technology (IT) curriculum is its ability to use existing courses in computer science and related cognate areas and thus to minimize the impact on existing resources while presenting an opportunity for gradual and managed curricular change.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
ABET/CAC. Criteria For Accrediting Computing Programs. http://www.abet.org/criteria_cac.html
 
2
ABET/EAC. Criteria For Accrediting Engineering Programs. http://www.abet.org/criteria_eac.html
 
3
ACM Curricula Recommendations. Computing Curricula 1991. http://www.acm.org/education/curricula.html
 
4
ACM Final Report of the Joint ACM/IEEE-CS Task Force on Computing Curricula 2001 for Computer Science. http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/final/index.htm
 
5
ACM Proceeding of the 4th conference on Information technology education. CITC4 '03 (Lafayette, Indiana, USA, October 16-18, 2003).
6
 
7
Ekstrom, J. Lunt,B. Helps,C. Education at the Seams: Preliminary Evaluation of Teaching Integration as a Key to Education in Information Technology. ASEE'2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
8
 
9
Lunt, Barry M., Joseph J. Ekstrom, Edith A. Lawson, Reza Kamali, Jacob Miller, Sandra Gorka, Han Reichgelt. Defining the IT Curriculum: The Results of the Past 2 Years. ASEE'2004, Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition.
10
 
11
Shackelford,R.(chair). Joint Task Force for Computing Curricula 2004 Computing Curricula 2004. STRAWMAN DRAFT (1 June 2004). http://www.acm.org/education/curricula.html
 
12
S.I.G.I.T.E. ACM Special Interest Group for Information Technology Education. <http://www.sigite.org/>
 
13
Wiggins,G and McTighe,J. Understanding by Design. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Design, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 1998.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Kenneth L. Alford: colleagues
Curtis A. Carter: colleagues
Daniel J. Ragsdale: colleagues
Eugene K. Ressler: colleagues
Charles W. Reynolds: colleagues