ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Enroute to making an IT baccalaureate program
Full text PdfPdf (235 KB)
Source Conference On Information Technology Education (formerly CITC) archive
Proceedings of the 5th conference on Information technology education table of contents
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
SESSION: The academic environment table of contents
Pages: 255 - 260  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-936-5
Authors
Soleda Leung  University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
Hazem Said  University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
Mark Stockman  University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
Sponsor
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 17,   Citation Count: 6
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1029533.1029597
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Several major factors have contributed to the birth of the new IT baccalaureate degree program at the University of Cincinnati. Of course the timing of IT emerging as an academic discipline has been a major one. Since CITC II several faculty members from the University of CINCINNATI have participated actively in SITE, later, SIGITE. With the arrival of new and exciting integrated technology, the stipulation to design an IT program meeting the needs of our society has become most important. Although originated by the entire group of Computer Science/Information Engineering Technology faculty, the project to step-by-step develop the IT program based on SIGITE's most current guidelines fell onto three such faculty members. The project also coincides with the University of CINCINNATI Collegiate Restructuring Initiative, mandated by the Provost. During the past 12 months, a comprehensive plan containing specific tasks with time-line for each was developed. This paper is to discuss the entire process including implementation, lessons learned, pitfalls to be avoided, opportunities encountered, inspirations found, enthusiasm subtended, etc.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
Information Technology Curriculum at UC CAS, <http://it.cas.uc.edu>
 
3
Kreppel, M.C., and Rabiee, M., University Community Partnership through Senior Design Projects, Proceedings of the 2003 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (Nashville, TN, June 2003)
4
 
5
Lunt, B.M., Ekstrom, J.J., Lawson, E.A., Kamali, R., Miller, J., Gorka, S., and Reichgelt, H. Defining the IT Curriculum: The Results of the Past 21/2 Years. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition (Salt Lake City, US, June 21-23, 2004)
 
6
Lunt, B.M., Lawson, E.A., Goodman, G., Helps, C.G.R, Designing an IT Curriculum: The Results of the First CITC Conference. Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition.
 
7
Reichgelt, H., Zhang, A., Price, B. Designing an Information Technology Curriculum: The Georgia Southern University Experience, Journal of Information Technology Education, Volume 1, No. 4, 2002.
8
9
 
10
SIGITE curriculum guidelines: <http://www.sigite.org>
11
 
12
UC General Education Program: <http://www.uc.edu/gened>

CITED BY  6

Collaborative Colleagues:
Soleda Leung: colleagues
Hazem Said: colleagues
Mark Stockman: colleagues