Real world problems bringing life to course content

ABSTRACT

The computer technology program at Purdue University prepares students for existing and emerging jobs and careers in the application of information systems and technology. Many courses are designed with a theoretical framework supplemented with hands-on learning experiences and reinforced by addressing real-world problems through class projects. These class projects are designed with a problem-based/problem-centered framework.

Anxious to engage in hands-on activity, students have a tendency to dive right into programming or systems design assignments. The use of structured methods that require careful planning like the process to define requirements, evaluate design options, build on schedule, and the setup of testing and evaluation tools do not hold much relevance to the budding IT professional. Projects change this perspective. Students gain a meaningful understanding of why and how structured methodologies affect success in a team-based environment. The implementation and relevance of textbook methodology comes to life in real-world examples of changing requirements, budget constraints, culture, and competing objectives. Students gain experience with the less tangible 'people skills' qualities that get lost in the prescriptive text book descriptions. While our experiences with the benefits to student learning are discussed here, the traps and obstacles to taking a project approach to traditional classroom instruction can be daunting. They include the ability to manage and direct open-ended assignments, managing student and customer expectations, engaging real-world customers, defining project scope, managing to a real world deliverable, liability issues, and customer commitment.

This paper reviews the lessons learned from five (5) different successful and unsuccessful experiences implementing problem-based/problem-centered learning within the undergraduate computer program at Purdue University.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bridges, Edwin M. with Hallinger, Philip. (1992). Problem-Based Learning for Administrators. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
• 2: Edens, Kellah M. (2000). Preparing problem solvers for the 21st century through Problem-based learning. College Teaching, 48 (2):55--60.
• 3: Mierson, Sheella & Parikh, Anuj A. (2000, January/February). Stories from the field: Problem-based learning from a teacher's and student's perspective. Change, 32, 20--27.
• 4: Cooper, J.L., Robinson P., & McKinney, M. (1993). Cooperative learning in the classroom. In D. F. Halpern (Ed.), Change College Classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• 5: Nilson, Linda B. (2003). Teaching at its Best (2nd ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing Company.
• 6: What Is The Relationship Between Problem-Based Learning And Other Instructional Approaches? (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2004 from Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, Center for Problem Based Learning Web site: http://www2.imsa.edu/programs/pbl/whatis/matrix/matrix2.html
• 7: How Does PBL Compare With Other Instructional Approaches? (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2004 from Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy, Center for Problem Based Learning Web site: http://www2.imsa.edu/programs/pbl/whatis/matrix/matrix1.html
• 8: Teaching and Learning Methods and Strategies. (n.d.). Retrieved April 14, 2004 from University of Arizona, Educational Technology from http://jamaica.u.arizona.edu/ic/edtech/strategy.html
• 9: Teaching Strategies: Problem-based Learning. (n.d.). Retrieved May 10, 2004 from University of Michigan, Center for Research on Problem and Teaching from http://www.crlt.umich.edu/tstrategies/tspbl.html

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  K. Computing Milieux
  K.3 COMPUTERS AND EDUCATION
      K.3.2 Computer and Information Science Education

General Terms:
Management

Keywords:
experiential learning, pedagogy, problem-based, problem-centered, project management, technology