Software piracy prevention through diversity

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Software piracy prevention through diversity

Full text

Pdf (166 KB)

Source

ACM Workshop On Digital Rights Management archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Digital rights management table of contents

Washington DC, USA

SESSION: Software protection table of contents

Pages: 63 - 71

Year of Publication: 2004

ISBN:1-58113-969-1

Authors

Bertrand Anckaert	Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Bjorn De Sutter	Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Koen De Bosschere	Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Sponsors

SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 28, Downloads (12 Months): 233, Citation Count: 2

Additional Information:

abstract references cited by index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1029146.1029157 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Software piracy is a major concern for software providers, despite the many defense mechanisms that have been proposed to prevent it. This paper identifies the fundamental weaknesses of existing approaches, resulting from the static nature of defense and the impossibility to prevent the duplication of digital data. A new scheme is presented that enables a more dynamic nature of defense and makes it harder to create an additional, equally useful copy. Furthermore it enables a fine-grained control over the distributed software. Its strength is based on diversity: each installed copy is unique and updates are tailored to work for one installed copy only.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	K. Altinkemer and J. Guan. Analyzing protection strategies for online software distribution. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 4(1):34--48, 2003.
	2	B. Anckaert, B. De Sutter, and K. De Bosschere. Steganography for executables. Technical Report R104.003, ELIS, Ghent University, 2004.
	3	Hoi Chang , Mikhail J. Atallah, Protecting Software Code by Guards, Revised Papers from the ACM CCS-8 Workshop on Security and Privacy in Digital Rights Management, p.160-175, November 05, 2001
	4	Stanley Chow , Philip A. Eisen , Harold Johnson , Paul C. van Oorschot, White-Box Cryptography and an AES Implementation, Revised Papers from the 9th Annual International Workshop on Selected Areas in Cryptography, p.250-270, August 15-16, 2002
	5	Frederick B. Cohen, Operating system protection through program evolution, Computers and Security, v.12 n.6, p.565-584, Oct. 1993 [doi>10.1016/0167-4048(93)90054-9]
	6	Christian Collberg , Clark Thomborson, Software watermarking: models and dynamic embeddings, Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT symposium on Principles of programming languages, p.311-324, January 20-22, 1999, San Antonio, Texas, United States [doi>10.1145/292540.292569]
	7	C. Collberg, C. Thomborson, and D. Low. A taxonomy of obfuscating transformations. Technical Report 148, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. of Auckland, 1997.
	8	Kathleen Reavis Conner , Richard P. Rumelt, Software piracy: an analysis of protection strategies, Management Science, v.37 n.2, p.125-139, Feb. 1991 [doi>10.1287/mnsc.37.2.125]
	9	Bruno De Bus , Daniel Kästner , Dominique Chanet , Ludo Van Put , Bjorn De Sutter, Post-pass compaction techniques, Communications of the ACM, v.46 n.8, August 2003 [doi>10.1145/859670.859696]
	10	Edward W. Felten, Understanding Trusted Computing: Will Its Benefits Outweigh Its Drawbacks?, IEEE Security and Privacy, v.1 n.3, p.60-62, May 2003 [doi>10.1109/MSECP.2003.1203224]
	11	Heise Online. Crack und Keymaker aktivieren Windows XP, February 2002. http://heise.de/newsticker/meldung/24775.
	12	Bill Horne , Lesley R. Matheson , Casey Sheehan , Robert Endre Tarjan, Dynamic Self-Checking Techniques for Improved Tamper Resistance, Revised Papers from the ACM CCS-8 Workshop on Security and Privacy in Digital Rights Management, p.141-159, November 05, 2001
	13	International Planning and Research Corporation. Software Management Guide, 2003.
	14	International Planning and Research Corporation. First Annual BSA and IDC Global Software Piracy Study, July 2004.
	15	Markus Jakobsson , Michael K. Reiter, Discouraging Software Piracy Using Software Aging, Revised Papers from the ACM CCS-8 Workshop on Security and Privacy in Digital Rights Management, p.1-12, November 05, 2001
	16	Microsoft. Microsoft Knowledge Base Article - 326904.
	17	Software and Information Industry Association. Report on global software piracy, 2000.
	18	P. van Oorschot. Revisiting software protection. Information Security, LNCS, 2851:1--13, 2003.
	19	Ramarathnam Venkatesan , Vijay V. Vazirani , Saurabh Sinha, A Graph Theoretic Approach to Software Watermarking, Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Information Hiding, p.157-168, April 25-27, 2001

CITED BY 2

	Bertrand Anckaert , Mariusz Jakubowski , Ramarathnam Venkatesan, Proteus: virtualization for diversified tamper-resistance, Proceedings of the ACM workshop on Digital rights management, October 30-30, 2006, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
	Petar Djekic , Claudia Loebbecke, Preventing application software piracy: An empirical investigation of technical copy protections, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, v.16 n.2, p.173-186, June, 2007