ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
DRM as a layered system
Full text PdfPdf (215 KB)
Source ACM Workshop On Digital Rights Management archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM workshop on Digital rights management table of contents
Washington DC, USA
SESSION: Systems and architectures table of contents
Pages: 11 - 21  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-969-1
Authors
Pramod A. Jamkhedkar  University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Gregory L. Heileman  University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM
Sponsors
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): ,   Downloads (12 Months): ,   Citation Count: 10
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1029146.1029151
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

The current landscape for digital rights management(DRM) consists of various ad hoc technologies and platforms that largely focus on copy protection. The fragmented nature of the DRM industry in 2004 is somewhat reminiscent of the telecommunications industry in the late 1980's. At that time various networking technologies were available, and what was needed was a technology that could integrate existing networks and provide various services to users. The OSI layered framework and the TCP/IP communications protocol suite provided a solution to this situation. The OSI model divides the process of digital data communications into layers. Likewise, in this paper we divide the process of DRM into layers in which various services are offered to the users of digital content at each layer. Three blocks of layers have been identified. The upper layers deal with the end-to-end functions of the application, the middle layers deal with rights expression and interpretation, and the lower layers ensure rights enforcement. This paper describes how responsibilities might be distributed among the various layers, and considers where in these layers it would be appropriate to define protocols and standards.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
J. Alvear. Realnetworks, Microsoft face off on DRM. streamingmedia.com, June 22, 2001.
 
2
H. Alverstrand. The role of the standards process in shaping the internet. Proceeding of the IEEE, 92(9):1371--1374, 2004.
 
3
ArtistScope. http://www.artistscope.com/copysafe/about.html.
 
4
A. Carroll, M. Juarez, J. Polk, and T. Leininger. Microsoft palladium: A business overview. Technical report, Microsoft Content Security Business Unit, June 2002.
 
5
V. G. Cerf. On the evolution of internet technologies. Proceeding of the IEEE, 92(9):1360--1370, 2004.
6
 
7
T. Clark. IBM closes cryptolopes unit, 2002. http://news.com.com/2100-1001-206465.html?legacy=cnet.
 
8
Contentguard. XrML 2.0 Technical Overview, March 2002.
 
9
 
10
The DRM vendor graveyard. http://www.info-mech.com/drm_vendor_graveyard.html.
 
11
J. Feigenbaum, D. Boneh, and R. Venkatesan. Report on the DIMACS workshop on management of digital intellectual property. Technical report, DIMACS, Apr. 2000. http://dimacs.rutgers.edu/Workshops/Management2/.
12
 
13
 
14
G. L. Heileman and C. E. Pizano. An overview of digital rights enforcement and the MediaRights technology. Technical report, Elisar Software Corporation, Apr. 2001.
 
15
R. Iannella. Open digital rights language (ODRL), Version 0.7. http://odrl.net/ODRL-07.pdf, Oct. 2000.
 
16
M. A. Kaplan. IBM cryptolopes, superdistribution and digital rights management, 1996. http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/people/k/kaplan/cryptolope-docs/crypap.html.
 
17
U. Kohl, J. Lotspiech, and M. A. Kaplan. Safeguarding digital library contents and users: Protecting documents rather than channels. D-Lib Magazine, Sept. 1997.
 
18
M. Krochmal. Alchemedia protects pictures with plug-ins. TechWeb News, Oct. 28, 1999. http://www.techweb.com/wire/story/TWB19991028S0012.
 
19
M. McKenzie. Copyright protection: Understanding your options. Technical Report 4, The Seybold Report on Internet Publishing, Dec. 1996.
 
20
MPEG-21 Committee. Information technology --- multimedia framework (MPEG-21) --- part 1: Vision, technologies and strategy. Working document: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 N 4333, July 2001.
 
21
M. L. Nelson, B. Argue, M. Efron, S. Denn, and M. Pattuelli. A survey of complex object technologies for digital libraries. Technical report, NASA TM-2001-211426, 2001.
22
 
23
 
24
25
 
26
 
27
B. Schneier. The fallacy of trusted client software (cryptorhythms column). Information Security Magazine, Aug. 2000.
 
28
 
29
O. Sibert, D. Bernstein, and D. Van Wie. Securing the content, not the wire, for information commerce. Technical report, InterTrust Technologies Corp., 1996.
 
30
 
31
The eXtensible Media Commerce Language (XMCL). http://www.xmcl.org.

CITED BY  10

Collaborative Colleagues:
Pramod A. Jamkhedkar: colleagues
Gregory L. Heileman: colleagues