ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
TinyPK: securing sensor networks with public key technology
Full text PdfPdf (205 KB)
Source Workshop on Security of ad hoc and Sensor Networks archive
Proceedings of the 2nd ACM workshop on Security of ad hoc and sensor networks table of contents
Washington DC, USA
SESSION: Key establishment in sensor networks table of contents
Pages: 59 - 64  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-972-1
Authors
Ronald Watro  BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA
Derrick Kong  BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA
Sue-fen Cuti  BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA
Charles Gardiner  BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA
Charles Lynn  BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA
Peter Kruus  BBN Technologies, Cambridge, MA
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGSAC: ACM Special Interest Group on Security, Audit, and Control
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 26,   Downloads (12 Months): 248,   Citation Count: 31
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1029102.1029113
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Wireless networks of miniaturized, low-power sensor/actuator devices are poised to become widely used in commercial and military environments. The communication security problems for these networks are exacerbated by the limited power and energy of the sensor devices. In this paper, we describe the design and implementation of public-key-(PK)-based protocols that allow authentication and key agreement between a sensor network and a third party as well as between two sensor networks. Our work is novel in that PK technology was commonly believed to be too inefficient for use on low-power devices. As part of our solution, we exploit the efficiency of public operations in the RSA cryptosystem and design protocols that place the computationally expensive operations on the parties external to the sensor network, when possible. Our protocols have been implemented on UC Berkeley MICA2 motes using the TinyOS development environment.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
B. Atwood, B. Warneke, K.S.J. Pister, "Preliminary Circuits for Smart Dust," Proceedings of the 2000 Southwest Symposium on Mixed-Signal Design, San Diego, California, February 27-29, 2000, pp. 87--92.
 
2
 
3
D. Boneh, "Twenty years of attacks on the RSA cryptosystem," Notices of the American Mathematical Society (AMS), Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 203--213, 1999.
 
4
D. Boneh and H. Shacham, "Fast variants of RSA," in RSA Laboratories' Cryptobytes, vol 5 no. 1, pages 1--8, Winter/Spring 2002.
 
5
D. Carman, P. Kruus, and B. Matt, "Constraints and Approaches for Distributed Sensor Network Security," NAI Labs, NAI Labs Technical Report #00-010, 1 September 2001.
 
6
Crossbow Technology, Inc., "Mote In-Network Programming User Reference," http://www.xbow.com/Support/Support_pdf_files/Xnp.pdf.
 
7
J. Deng, R. Han, and S. Mishra, "A Performance Evaluation of Intrusion-Tolerant Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks," in F. Zhao and L. Guibas (Eds.), IPSN 2003, LNCS 2634, Springer-Verlag, pp.349--364, 2003.
 
8
W. Diffie and M.E. Hellman, "New Directions in Cryptography," IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. IT-22, no. 6, pp. 644--654", 1976.
 
9
10
 
11
M. Horton, D. Culler, K.S.J. Pister, J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, and A. Woo, "MICA: The Commercialization of Microsensor Motes," Sensor, April 2002.
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
D. Malan, Crypto for Tiny Objects, TR-04-04, Computer Science Group, Harvard University, 2004.
16
17
 
18

CITED BY  31

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ronald Watro: colleagues
Derrick Kong: colleagues
Sue-fen Cuti: colleagues
Charles Gardiner: colleagues
Charles Lynn: colleagues
Peter Kruus: colleagues