ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Traffic matrix estimation on a large IP backbone: a comparison on real data
Full text PdfPdf (598 KB)
Source Internet Measurement Conference archive
Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement table of contents
Taormina, Sicily, Italy
SESSION: Traffic matrix estimation and tomography table of contents
Pages: 149 - 160  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-821-0
Authors
Anders Gunnar  Swedish Institute of Computer Science, Kista, Sweden
Mikael Johansson  Sensors and Systems, KTH, Stockholm, Sweden
Thomas Telkamp  Global Crossing, Ltd, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Sponsors
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 86,   Citation Count: 8
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1028788.1028807
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper considers the problem of estimating the point-to-point traffic matrix in an operational IP backbone. Contrary to previous studies, that have used a partial traffic matrix or demands estimated from aggregated Netflow traces, we use a unique data set of complete traffic matrices from a global IP network measured over five-minute intervals. This allows us to do an accurate data analysis on the time-scale of typical link-load measurements and enables us to make a balanced evaluation of different traffic matrix estimation techniques. We describe the data collection infrastructure, present spatial and temporal demand distributions, investigate the stability of fan-out factors, and analyze the mean-variance relationships between demands. We perform a critical evaluation of existing and novel methods for traffic matrix estimation, including recursive fanout estimation, worst-case bounds, regularized estimation techniques, and methods that rely on mean variance relationships. We discuss the weaknesses and strengths of the various methods, and highlight differences in the results for the European and American subnetworks.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
H. Abrahamsson, J. Alonso, B. Ahlgren, A. Andersson, and P. Kreuger, "A multi path routing algorithm for IP networks based on flow optimisation," in From QoS Provisioning to QoS Charging -- Third COST 263 International Workshop on Quality of Future Internet Services, QoFIS 2002 and Second Interntational Workshop on Internet Charging and QoS Technologies, ICQT 2002, B. Stiller, M. Smirnow, M. Karsten, and P. Reichl, Eds., Zurich, Switzerland, Oct. 2002, pp. 135--144, Springer, LNCS 2511.
 
2
A. Sridarhan, R. Guerin, and C. Diot, "Achieving near-optimal traffic engineering solutions for current OSPF/IS-IS networks," in Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM 2003, San Francisco, USA, November 2003.
3
4
 
5
J. Cao, D. Davis, S. Vander Wiel, and B. Yu, "Time-varying network tomography: router link data," Journal of Americal Statistical Association, vol. 95, pp. 1063--1075, 2000.
6
 
7
A. Medina, C. Fraleigh, N. Taft, S. Bhattacharyya, and C. Diot, "A Taxonomy of IP Traffic Matrices," in SPIE ITCOM: Scalability and Traffic Control in IP Networks II, Boston, Aug. 2002.
 
8
J. Kruithof, "Telefoonverkeersrekening," De Ingenieur, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. E15--E25, 1937.
 
9
Y. Vardi, "Network tomography: Estimating source-destination traffic intensities from link data," Journal of the Americal Statistical Association, vol. 91, no. 433, pp. 365--377, March 1996.
 
10
C. Tebaldi and M. West, "Bayesian inference on network traffic using link count data," Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 93, no. 442, pp. 557--576, June 1998.
 
11
S. Vaton and A. Gravey, "Network tomography: an iterative bayesian analysis," in Proc. ITC 18, Berlin, Germany, August 2003.
12
13
 
14
A. Nucci, R. Cruz, N. Taft, and C. Diot, "Design of IGP link weight changes for estimation of traffic matrices," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Hong Kong, March 2004.
15
 
16
R. S. Krupp, "Properties of Kruithof's projection method," The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 517--538, February 1979.
 
17
A. Medina, K. Salamatian, N. Taft, I. Matta, Y. Tsang, and C. Diot, "On the convergence of statistical techniques for inferring network traffic demands," Tech. Rep. BUCS-2003-003, Boston University, Computer Science, USA, February 2003.
 
18
G. K. Zipf, "Somde determinants of the circulation of information," American Journal of Psychology, vol. 59, pp. 401--421, 1946.
 
19
J. Kowalski and B. Warfield, "Modeling traffic demand between nodes in a telecommunications network," in Australian Telecommunications and Networks Conference, Sydney, Australia, December 1995.
20
 
21
I. Csiszár and G. Tusnády, "Information geometry and alternating minimization procedures," Statistics and Decisions, Suppl. 1, vol. Supplement Issue No. 1, pp. 205--237, 1984.
 
22
I. Csiszár, "Why least squares and maximum entropy? - an axiomatic approach to inverse problems," The Annals of Statistics, vol. 19, pp. 2033--2066, December 1991.
 
23
X. Xiao, A. Hannan, B. Bailey, and L. M. Ni, "Traffic engineering with MPLS in the internet," IEEE Network, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 28--33, March-April 2000.
 
24
Cariden, Inc., Mountain View, CA, MATE, 2004, http://www.cariden.com.
 
25
R. Morris and D. Lin, "Variance of aggregated web traffic," in Proc. IEEE INFOCOM, Tel Aviv, Israel, March 2000, pp. 360--366.
 
26
M. Coates, A. Hero, R. Nowak, and B. Yu, "Internet tomography," Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 47--65, May 2002.
27

CITED BY  9

Collaborative Colleagues:
Anders Gunnar: colleagues
Mikael Johansson: colleagues
Thomas Telkamp: colleagues