ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Legally speaking: is information property?
Full text PdfPdf (3.09 MB)
Source
Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 34 ,  Issue 3  (March 1991) table of contents
Pages: 15 - 18  
Year of Publication: 1991
ISSN:0001-0782
Author
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 3,   Downloads (12 Months): 26,   Citation Count: 2
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/102868.102875
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This column will discuss why the law has traditionally resisted characterizing information as the sort of thing that can be private property, and will speculate about why judges may be more receptive nowadays to assertions that information should be treated as property. This new attitude is illustrated by a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court decision which upheld criminal convictions based solely on the misappropriation of information which the Court found to be the property of one of the defendants' employers.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Jefferson, T. Writings of Thomas Jefferson, vol. 6, H.A. Washington, Ed., 1854, pp. 180-181.
 
2
Samuelson, P. Information As Prop erty: Do Ruckelshaus and Carpenter signal a changing direction in intellectual property law? Catholic University Law Rev. 38 (1989), 365.