ABSTRACT
In human motion control applications, the mapping between a control specification and an appropriate target motion often defies an explicit encoding. We present a method that allows such a mapping to be defined by example, given that the control specification is recorded motion. Our method begins by building a database of semantically meaningful instances of the mapping, each of which is represented by synchronized segments of control and target motion. A dynamic programming algorithm can then be used to interpret an input control specification in terms of mapping instances. This interpretation induces a sequence of target segments from the database, which is concatenated to create the appropriate target motion. We evaluate our method on two examples of indirect control. In the first, we synthesize a walking human character that follows a sampled trajectory. In the second, we generate a synthetic partner for a dancer whose motion is acquired through motion capture.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
 |
1
|
|
 |
2
|
|
 |
3
|
|
| |
4
|
|
 |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
{DB01} De La Torre F., Black M.: Dynamic coupled component analysis. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2001), 643--650.
|
| |
7
|
|
 |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
|
 |
11
|
|
| |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
{Hut73} Hutchinson A.: Labanotation: The System of Analyzing and Recording Movement, third ed. Routledge, New York, 1973.
|
| |
14
|
|
 |
15
|
|
 |
16
|
|
 |
17
|
|
 |
18
|
|
 |
19
|
|
 |
20
|
|
 |
21
|
|
| |
22
|
|
| |
23
|
|
 |
24
|
|
| |
25
|
{Vic03} Vicon: Vicon iQ Reference Manual. Vicon Motion Systems Inc., Lake Forest, CA, 2003.
|
|