|
ABSTRACT
We propose an adaptive middleware design for context-aware applications that abstracts the applications from the sensors that provide context. Further, we use application-specific utility functions to choose, given multiple alternatives for providing a specific context, one alternative at any time that provides the context for all applications, whilst maximising the applications' total "satisfaction" with the quality of context from the chosen provider. Our middleware also implements autonomic properties, such as self-configuration and resilience to failures, in the provision of context information to context-aware applications.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
T. Buchholz, A. Küpper, and M. Schiffers. Quality of context: What it is and why we need it. In Proceedings of the Workshop of the HP Open View University Association 2003 (HPOVUA 2003), Geneva, 2003.
|
| |
3
|
A. K. Dey and G. D. Abowd. A conceptual framework and a toolkit for supporting the rapid prototyping of context-aware applications. Human-Computer Interaction, 16:97--166, 2001.
|
| |
4
|
E. Frank and I. H. Witten. Selecting multiway splits in decision trees.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
CITED BY 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amirhosein Taherkordi , Romain Rouvoy , Quan Le-Trung , Frank Eliassen, A self-adaptive context processing framework for wireless sensor networks, Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on Middleware for sensor networks, p.7-12, December 01-01, 2008, Leuven, Belgium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|