Wolves, football, and ambient computing: facilitating collaboration in problem solving systems through the study of human and animal groups

ABSTRACT

This paper describes how computer-human interaction in ambient computing environments can be best informed by conceptualizing of such environments as problem solving systems. Typically, such systems comprise multiple human and technological agents that meet the demands imposed by problem constraints through dynamic collaboration. A key assertion is that the design of ambient computing environments towards efficacious human-machine collaboration can benefit from an understanding of competence models of human-human and animal-animal collaboration. Consequently, design principles for such environments are derived from a review of competent collaboration in human groups, such as sport teams, and animal groups, such as wolf packs.

REFERENCES

• 1: Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Converse, S. A. (1993). Shared mental models in expert decision making teams. In N. J. Castellan, Jr. (Ed.), Current issues in individual and group decision making (pp. 221--246). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• 2: Christoffersen, K., & Woods, D. D. (2002). How to make automated systems team players. In E. Salas (Ed.), Advances in human performance and cognitive engineering research, Volume 2. Oxford, England: JAI Press/Elsevier.
• 3: Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptation to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273--305.
• 4: Robert R. Hoffman , Patrick Hayes , Kenneth M. Ford , Peter Hancock, The Triples Rule, IEEE Intelligent Systems, v.17 n.3, p.62-65, May 2002 [doi>10.1109/MIS.2002.1005633]
• 5: James Hollan , Edwin Hutchins , David Kirsh, Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), v.7 n.2, p.174-196, June 2000 [doi>10.1145/353485.353487]
• 6: Hutchins, E. (1995a). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• 7: Hutchins, E. (1995b). How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cognitive Science, 19, 265--288.
• 8: David Kirsh, The intelligent use of space, Artificial Intelligence, v.73 n.1-2, p.31-68, Feb. 1995 [doi>10.1016/0004-3702(94)00017-U]
• 9: David Kirsh, Adapting the environment instead of oneself, Adaptive Behavior, v.4 n.3-4, p.415-452, Winter/Spring 1996 [doi>10.1177/105971239600400307]
• 10: Luria, A. R. (1974). The working brain. London: Penguin.
• 11: Luria, A. R. (1983). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology (B. Haigh, Trans.). Harmondsworth, England: Penguin. (Original work published in 1973).
• 12: MacMillan, J., Entin, E. E., & Serfaty, D. (2002). A framework for understanding the relationship between team structure and the communication necessary for effective team cognition. In E. Salas, S. M. Fiore, & J. A. Cannon-Bowers (Eds.), Team cognition: Process and performance at the inter- and intra-individual level (pp. 112--139). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• 13: Norman, D. A. (1992). Turn signals are the facial expressions of automobiles. Boston, MA: Addison Wesley.
• 14: Donald A. Norman, Cognitive artifacts, Designing interaction: psychology at the human-computer interface, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1991
• 15: Norman, D. A. (1990). The "problem" of automation: Inappropriate feedback and interaction, not "over-automation." Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 585--593
• 16: Emily S. Patterson , David D. Woods, Shift Changes, Updates, and the On-Call Architecture in Space Shuttle Mission Control, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, v.10 n.3-4, p.317-346, December 2001 [doi>10.1023/A:1012705926828]
• 17: Patterson, E. S., Woods, D. D., Sarter, N. B., & Watts-Perotti, J. (1998, May). Patterns in cooperative cognition. COOP '98, Third International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 13--23.
• 18: Potter, S. S., Roth, E. M., Woods, D. D., & Elm, W. (2000). Bootstrapping multiple converging cognitive task analysis techniques for system design. In J. M. C. Schraagen, S. F. Chipman, & V. L. Shalin (Eds.), Cognitive task analysis (pp. 317--340). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• 19: Kasim Rehman , Frank Stajano , George Coulouris, Interfacing with the invisible computer, Proceedings of the second Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction, October 19-23, 2002, Aarhus, Denmark [doi>10.1145/572020.572048]
• 20: Rouse, W. B., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1992). The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 22, 1296--1308.
• 21: Segal, L. D. (1994). Actions speak louder than words: How pilots use nonverbal information for crew communications. Proc. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting, 1228--1232.
• 22: Smith, W. J. (1977). The behavior of communicating. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• 23: Peter Tolmie , James Pycock , Tim Diggins , Allan MacLean , Alain Karsenty, Unremarkable computing, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Changing our world, changing ourselves, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/503376.503448]
• 24: Treisman, A. M. (1991). Search, similarity, and integration of features between and within dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 652--676.
• 25: Weiser, M. (1991). The computer for the twenty-first century. Scientific American, 94--10.
• 26: Wittenbaum, G. M., Vaughan, S. I., & Stasser, G. (1998). Coordination in task-performing groups. In R. S. Tindale & L. Heath (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups: Social psychological applications to social issues (Vol. 4, pp. 177--204). New York: Plenum.
• 27: Woods, D. D. (1997). Human-centered software agents: Lessons from clumsy automation. In J. Flanagan, T. Huang, P. Jones, & S. Kasif, S. (Eds.), Human centered systems: Information, interactivity, and intelligence (pp. 288--293). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
• 28: Woods, D. D., & Sarter, N. B. (2000). Learning from automation surprises and "going sour" accidents. In N. B. Sarter & R. Amalberti (Eds.), cognitive engineering in the aviation domain (pp. 327--353). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
• 29: Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 156--161.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.m Miscellaneous

Keywords:
ambient computing, collaboration, computer-human interaction, pervasive computing, problem solving