Identifying the addressee in human-human-robot interactions based on head pose and speech

ABSTRACT

In this work we investigate the power of acoustic and visual cues, and their combination, to identify the addressee in a human-human-robot interaction. Based on eighteen audio-visual recordings of two human beings and a (simulated) robot we discriminate the interaction of the two humans from the interaction of one human with the robot. The paper compares the result of three approaches. The first approach uses purely acoustic cues to find the addressees. Low level, feature based cues as well as higher-level cues are examined. In the second approach we test whether the human's head pose is a suitable cue. Our results show that visually estimated head pose is a more reliable cue for the identification of the addressee in the human-human-robot interaction. In the third approach we combine the acoustic and visual cues which results in significant improvements.

REFERENCES

• 1: Special Issue on Human-Friendly Robots, volume 16. Journal of the Robotics Society of Japan, 1998.
• 2: Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Humanoid Robots - Humanoids 2003. IEEE, Karlsruhe, Germany, 2003.
• 3: M. Argyle. Social Interaction. Methuen, London, 1969.
• 4: I. Bakx, K. van Turnhout, and J. Terken. Facial orientation during multi-party interaction with information kiosks. In Proceedings of the Interact 2003, Zurich, Switzerland, 2003.
• 5: J.W. Tankard. Effects of eye position on person perception. Perc. Mot. Skills, (31):883--93, 1970.
• 6: M. Katzenmaier. Determining the adressee in spoken human robot interaction, studienarbeit. Technical report, Fakultat fur Informatik, Universitat Karlsruhe (TH), 2003.
• 7: C. L. Kleinke, A. A. Bustos, F. B. Meeker, and R. A. Staneski. Effects of self-attributed and other-attributed gaze in interpersonal evaluations between males and females. Journal of experimental social Psychology, (9):154--63, 1973.
• 8: Paul P. Maglio , Teenie Matlock , Christopher S. Campbell , Shumin Zhai , Barton A. Smith, Gaze and Speech in Attentive User Interfaces, Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Advances in Multimodal Interfaces, p.1-7, October 14-16, 2000
• 9: J. Ruusuvuori. Looking means listening: coordinating displays of engagement in doctor-patient interaction. Social Science & Medicine, 52:1093--1108, 2001.
• 10: Tracking Focus of Attention in Meetings, Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, p.273, October 14-16, 2002 [doi>10.1109/ICMI.2002.1167006]
• 11: Rainer Stiefelhagen , Jie Zhu, Head orientation and gaze direction in meetings, CHI '02 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, April 20-25, 2002, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA [doi>10.1145/506443.506634]
• 12: Roel Vertegaal , Robert Slagter , Gerrit van der Veer , Anton Nijholt, Eye gaze patterns in conversations: there is more to conversational agents than meets the eyes, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, p.301-308, March 2001, Seattle, Washington, United States [doi>10.1145/365024.365119]

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

General Terms:
Human Factors

Keywords:
attentive interfaces, focus of attention, head pose estimation, human-robot interaction, multimodal interfaces, speech recognition