|
ABSTRACT
In this paper the authors discuss the accumulated incremental changes fostered by IT and how they change campus culture and life for all members of the campus community. This presentation is a user-centered perspective looking not at how infrastructure and resources have changed, but rather how IT changes make a differences (positive or negative) in teaching, learning, working and living on campus. A better understanding of the impact UCCs (University Computing Centers) have on all aspects of campus life can improve planning and training. This challenge arises from the ubiquitous presence of IT on campus affecting all aspects of campus life - learning, teaching, working, and living. Technology's capability, availability, reliability, and ease of use lead to changes in roles, responsibilities, expectations, access and relationships among and between faculty, staff, students and administrators. Computer center services play a significant role in identifying and addressing these issues as users' adoption or rejection of these resources is determined not by the power of the technology, but by user perceptions of how IT's power facilitates their accomplishing their objectives.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Ehrmann, S.C. (1999). Asking the hard questions about technology use and education. Change, 31, (2), 25--29.
|
| |
2
|
Green, K.C. (2002). Campus computing 2002. Claremont, CA, The Campus Computing Project.
|
| |
3
|
Hammer, M. & Stanton, S.A. (1995). The reengineering revolution: A handbook. New York: HarperCollins.
|
| |
4
|
Hickman, L.A. (1990). John Dewey's pragmatic technology. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
Jones, T.E. (1999). If it's broken you can fix it: Overcoming dysfunction in the workplace. New York: AMACOM Press.
|
| |
7
|
Keehn, A. K., & Norris D.M. (2003). IT planning: Cultivating innovation and value. Syllabus Magazine, 17 (4),10--11.
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
| |
10
|
Manzoni, J. F., & Angehrm. A. A., (1997-98). Understanding organizational dynamics of IT-enabled change: A multimedia simulation approach. Journal of Information Management Systems, 14 (3), (109--140).
|
| |
11
|
Massy, W.F. (2003, June). Auditing higher education to improve quality, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49 (1), B16. {On-Line}. Available: http://chronicle.com/weekly/v49/i41/41b01601.htm
|
| |
12
|
National Research Council of the national Academies. (2002). Preparing for the revolution: Information technology and the future of the research university. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
|
| |
13
|
Petzinger, T. Jr. (1999). The new pioneers: The men and women who are transforming the workplace and marketplace. New York: Simon & Schuster.
|
| |
14
|
Smart, J.C., Kuh, G.D., & Tierney, W.G. (1997). The roles of institutional cultures and decision approaches in promoting organizational effectiveness in two-year colleges. The Journal of Higher Education, 68, (3), 256--281.
|
| |
15
|
|
| |
16
|
Strauss, H. (2003, November). New learning spaces: Smart learners, not smart classrooms. Syllabus Magazine, 17 (4).
|
| |
17
|
Tenner, E. (1996). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
|
| |
18
|
|
| |
19
|
Young, Jeffrey R. (2004) Libraries Aim to Widen Google's Eyes: Search engines want to make scholarly work more visible on the Web, The Chronicle of Higher Education, Volume 50, Issue 37, Page A1.
|
|