ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Successful approaches in the TREC video retrieval evaluations
Full text PdfPdf (1.20 MB)
Source International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia table of contents
New York, NY, USA
SESSION: Brave new topics -- session 3: the effect of benchmarking on advances in semantic video table of contents
Pages: 668 - 675  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-893-8
Authors
Alexander G. Hauptmann  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Michael G. Christel  Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA
Sponsors
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 81,   Citation Count: 24
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1027527.1027681
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

This paper reviews successful approaches in evaluations of video retrieval over the last three years. The task involves the search and retrieval of shots from MPEG digitized video recordings using a combination of automatic speech, image and video analysis and information retrieval technologies. The search evaluations are grouped into interactive (with a human in the loop) and non-interactive (where the human merely enters the query into the system) submissions. Most non-interactive search approaches have relied extensively on text retrieval, and only recently have image-based features contributed reliably to improved search performance. Interactive approaches have substantially outperformed all non-interactive approaches, with most systems relying heavily on the user's ability to refine queries and reject spurious answers. We will examine both the successful automatic search approaches and the user interface techniques that have enabled high performance video retrieval.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Boldareva, L., de Vries, A., and Hiemstra, D. Monitoring User-System Performance in Interactive Retrieval Tasks. Proc. RIAO 2004 (Avignon, France, April 2004), pp. 474--483.
 
2
Boldareva, L., and Hiemstra, D. Interactive Content-Based Retrieval Using Pre-computed Object-Object Similarities. In Proc. CIVR 2004 (Dublin, Ireland, July 2004).
 
3
Christel, M., Huang, C., Moraveji, N., and Papernick, N. A Comparative Study of Evidence Combination Strategies. In Proc. ICASSP (Montreal, May 2004), pp. 1032--1035.
4
 
5
Christel, M. submitted to ACM Multimedia 2004.
 
6
 
7
 
8
Lee, H. and Smeaton, A.F. Designing the User Interface for the Fischlar Digital Video Library. J. Digital Info 2(4), May 2002.
 
9
NIST, Digital Video Retrieval at NIST: TREC Video Retrieval Evaluation, 2001-2004, http://www-nlpir.nist.gov/projects/trecvid/.
 
10
Rautiainen, M., Ojala, T., and Seppanen, T. Cluster-temporal browsing of large news video databases. In Proc. IEEE ICME (Taipei, Taiwan, June 2004).
 
11
Rowe, L.A. and Jain, R. ACM SIGMM Retreat Report on Future Directions in Multimedia Research, March 2004, www.acm.org/sigmm/main/events/sigmm_retreat/sigmm-retreat03-final.htm.
12
 
13
Wildemuth, B., Yang, M., Hughes, A., Gruss, R., Geisler, G., and Marchionini, G. Access via Features vs. Access via Transcripts: User Performance and Satisfaction. In Proc. TRECVID (Gaithersburg, MD, Nov. 2003),
 
14
Yavlinsky, A., Pickering, M., Heesch, D., Ruger, S. A Comparative Study of Evidence Combination Strategies. In Proc. ICASSP (Montreal, May 2004), pp. 1040--1043.
 
15
 
16
R. Ruiloba, P. Joly, S. Marchand-Maillet, G. Quénot : "Towards a Standard Protocol for the Evaluation of Video-to-Shots Segmentation Algorithms", International Workshop in Content-Based Multimedia Indexing (CBMI), Toulouse France.
 
17
NIST TREC 2002, Results of the Video Track, http://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec10/appendices/video_results.html
 
18
J. Smith, S. Srinivasan, A. Amir, S. Basu, G. Iyengar, C. Lin, Milind Naade, D. Ponceleon, and B Tseng, "Integrating Features, Models, and Semantics for TREC Video Retrieval," NIST TREC-10 Text Retrieval Conference, Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 2001.
 
19
J. Baan, A. van Ballegooij, J-M. Geusebroek, D. Hiemstra, J. den Hartog, J. List, C. Snoek, I. Patras, S. Raaijmakers, L. Todoran, J. Vendrig, A. de Vries, T. Westerveld and M. Worring, Lazy Users and Automatic Video Retrieval Tools in (the) Lowlands. In Proceedings of the 10th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC), November 2001.
 
20
Hauptmann, A., Jin, R. , N. Papernick, D. Ng, Y. Qi, Houghton, R Thornton, S. Video Retrieval with the Informedia Digital Video Library System , The Tenth Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-2001) Gaithersburg, Maryland, November 13-16, 2001
 
21
J. R. Smith, W.H. Adams, A. Amir, C. Dorai, S. Ghosal, G. Iyengar, A. Jaimes, C. Lang, C.-Y.Lin, A. Natsev, C. Neti, H. J. Nock, H. Permuter, R. Singh, S. Srinivasan, B. L. Tseng, AT Varadaraju, D. Zhang,"IBM Research TREC-2002 Video Retrieval System," NIST Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-2002), Nov., 2002.
 
22
J. Vendrig, J. den Hartog, D. van Leeuwen, I. Patras, S. Raaijmakers, C. Snoek, J. van Rest and M. Worring, TREC Feature Extraction by Active Learning. In Proceedings of the 11th Text Retrieval Conference (TREC), Nov. 2002.
 
23
X.-S. Hua, P. Yin, H. Wang, J. Chen, L. Lu, M. Li, H.-J. Zhang, "MSR-Asia at TREC-11 Video Track," TRECVID 2002.
 
24
Rautiainen M, Penttilä J, Vorobiev D, Noponen K, Väyrynen P, Hosio M, Matinmikko E, Mäkelä SM, Peltola J, Ojala T & Seppäänen T (2002) TREC 2002 Video Track experiments at MediaTeam Oulu and VTT. Proc. Text Retrieval Conference TREC 2002 Video Track, Gaithersburg, MD, Nov. 2002.
 
25
Wolf, C., Doermann, D., and Rautiainen, M. Video Indexing and Retrieval at UMD. Proceedings of the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC) 2002. November 19th-22th, 2002, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
 
26
A. Hauptmann, R.V. Baron, M.-Y. Chen, M. Christel, P. Duygulu, C. Huang, R. Jin, W.-H. Lin, T. Ng, N. Moraveji, N. Papernick, C.G.M. Snoek, G. Tzanetakis, J. Yang, R. Yan, and H.D. Wactlar, Informedia at TRECVID 2003: Analyzing and Searching Broadcast News Video, Proceedings of (VIDEO) TREC 2003, November 2003.
 
27
Chen, M-Y., and Hauptmann, A., Searching for a Specific Person in Broadcast News Video, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP'04), Montreal, Canada, May 17-21, 2004
 
28
Westerveld, T,. Ianeva, T., Boldareva, L., de Vries, A.P. and Hiemstra, D. Combining Information Sources for Video Retrieval In: TRECVID 2003 Workshop, Nov., 2003
 
29
A. Amir, W, Hsu, G. Iyengar, C.-Y.Lin, M. Naade, A. Natsev, C. Neti, H. J. Nock, J. R. Smith, B. L. Tseng, Y. Wu, D. Zhang, "IBM Research TRECVID-2003 System," Proc. NIST Text Retrieval Conf. (TREC), Gaithersburg, MD, Nov., 2003.
 
30
The Internet Archive Movie Archive Home Page. (2002) URL: www.archive.org/movies
 
31
Open Video Digital Library, http://www.open-video.org/
 
32
Yan, R., Hauptmann, A.G. and Jin, R., Pseudo-Relevance Feedback for Multimedia Retrieval, in Video Mining, Rosenfeld, A., Doermann, D., and DeMenthon, D. (eds), Kluwer, Boston, pp. 309--338, 2003.

CITED BY  24

Collaborative Colleagues:
Alexander G. Hauptmann: colleagues
Michael G. Christel: colleagues