ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Manifold-ranking based image retrieval
Full text PdfPdf (315 KB)
Source International Multimedia Conference archive
Proceedings of the 12th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia table of contents
New York, NY, USA
SESSION: Technical session 1: content-based image retrieval table of contents
Pages: 9 - 16  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-893-8
Authors
Jingrui He  Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Mingjing Li  Microsft Research Asia, Beijing, China
Hong-Jiang Zhang  Microsft Research Asia, Beijing, China
Hanghang Tong  Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Changshui Zhang  Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Sponsors
SIGMULTIMEDIA: ACM Special Interest Group on Multimedia
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 20,   Downloads (12 Months): 147,   Citation Count: 37
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1027527.1027531
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we propose a novel transductive learning framework named manifold-ranking based image retrieval (MRBIR). Given a query image, MRBIR first makes use of a manifold ranking algorithm to explore the relationship among all the data points in the feature space, and then measures relevance between the query and all the images in the database accordingly, which is different from traditional similarity metrics based on pair-wise distance. In relevance feedback, if only positive examples are available, they are added to the query set to improve the retrieval result; if examples of both labels can be obtained, MRBIR discriminately spreads the ranking scores of positive and negative examples, considering the asymmetry between these two types of images. Furthermore, three active learning methods are incorporated into MRBIR, which select images in each round of relevance feedback according to different principles, aiming to maximally improve the ranking result. Experimental results on a general-purpose image database show that MRBIR attains a significant improvement over existing systems from all aspects.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bengio, Y., Vincent, P., and Paiement, J. Learning Eigenfunctions of Similarity: Linking Spectral Clustering and Kernel PCA. Technical Report 1232, University of Montreal, 2003.
 
2
Chen, Y., Zhou, X., and Huang, T. One-class SVM for learning in image retrieval. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing, vol. 1, pp. 34--37, 2001.
 
3
4
 
5
 
6
Kokare, M., Chatterji, B.N., and Biswas, P.K. Comparison of similarity metrics for texture image retrieval. IEEE Conf. on Convergent Technologies for Asia-Pacific Region, vol. 2, pp. 571--575, 2003.
 
7
Li, B., Chang, E., and Li, C.S. Learning image query concepts via intelligent sampling. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Multimedia & Expo, pp. 961--964, 2001.
 
8
Li, B., Chang, E., and Wu, C.T. DPF-a perceptual distance function for image retrieval. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 597--600, 2002.
 
9
 
10
 
11
12
13
 
14
 
15
Rocchio, J.J. Relevance feedback in information retrieval. The SMART Retrieval System, pp. 313--323, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1971.
 
16
 
17
Rui, Y., et al. Relevance feedback: a power tool for interactive content-based image retrieval. IEEE Trans. Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 1998.
 
18
Rui, Y., Huang, T., and Mehrotra, S. Content-based image retrieval with relevance feedback in MARS. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing, pp. 815--818, 1997.
 
19
Schmid, C. A structured probabilistic model for recognition. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 2, pp. 490, 1999.
 
20
 
21
 
22
Stricker, M., and Orengo, M. Similarity of color images. Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases, Proc. SPIE 2420, pp 381--392, 1995.
 
23
 
24
Tieu, K., and Viola, P. Boosting image retrieval. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 228--235, 2000.
25
 
26
Wang, J.Z., Wiederhold, G., Firschein, O., and Sha, X.W. Content-based image indexing and searching using Daubechies' wavelets. Int. Journal of Digital Libraries, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 311--328, 1998.
 
27
Wu, Y., Tian, Q., and Huang, T. Discriminant-EM algorithm with application to image retrieval. Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 155--162, 2000.
 
28
Zhang, L., Lin, F., and Zhang, B. Support vector machine learning for image retrieval. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 721--724, 2001.
 
29
Zhou, D., et al. Learning with local and global consistency. NIPS, 2003.
 
30
Zhou, D., et al. Ranking on data manifolds. NIPS, 2003.
 
31
Zhou, X.S., Rui, Y., and Huang, T. Water-Filling: a novel way for image structural feature extraction. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Image Processing, vol. 2, pp. 570--574, 1999.

CITED BY  37

Collaborative Colleagues:
Jingrui He: colleagues
Mingjing Li: colleagues
Hong-Jiang Zhang: colleagues
Hanghang Tong: colleagues
Changshui Zhang: colleagues