ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Lighting sensitive display
Full text PdfPdf (226 KB)
Source ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) archive
Volume 23 ,  Issue 4  (October 2004) table of contents
Pages: 963 - 979  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:0730-0301
Authors
Shree K. Nayar  Columbia University, New York, NY
Peter N. Belhumeur  Columbia University, New York, NY
Terry E. Boult  University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, CO
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 14,   Downloads (12 Months): 82,   Citation Count: 7
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1027411.1027414
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Although display devices have been used for decades, they have functioned without taking into account the illumination of their environment. We present the concept of a lighting sensitive display (LSD)---a display that measures the incident illumination and modifies its content accordingly. An ideal LSD would be able to measure the 4D illumination field incident upon it and generate a 4D light field in response to the illumination. However, current sensing and display technologies do not allow for such an ideal implementation. Our initial LSD prototype uses a 2D measurement of the illumination field and produces a 2D image in response to it. In particular, it renders a 3D scene such that it always appears to be lit by the real environment that the display resides in. The current system is designed to perform best when the light sources in the environment are distant from the display, and a single user in a known location views the display.

The displayed scene is represented by compressing a very large set of images (acquired or rendered) of the scene that correspond to different lighting conditions. The compression algorithm is a lossy one that exploits not only image correlations over the illumination dimensions but also coherences over the spatial dimensions of the image. This results in a highly compressed representation of the original image set. This representation enables us to achieve high quality relighting of the scene in real time. Our prototype LSD can render 640 × 480 images of scenes under complex and varying illuminations at 15 frames per second using a 2 GHz processor. We conclude with a discussion on the limitations of the current implementation and potential areas for future research.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Antwerp, J. C. V. 1985. Automatic Brightness Control Apparatus. United States Patent 4,514,727 (April).
 
2
 
3
Barbier, B., Ediar, S., and Brun, J. 1991. System for the Display of Luminous Data with Improved Readability. United States Patent 5,057,744 (October).
 
4
Basri, R. and Jacobs, D. 2001. Lambertian reflectance and linear subspaces. In International Conference on Computer Vision. 383--390.
 
5
 
6
Biggs, A. J. 1965. Compensator for Color-Television Receivers for Chromacity Variations in Ambient Light. United States Patent 3,200,193 (August).
 
7
Constable, D. W. 1978. Ambient Light Contrast and Color Control Circuit. United States Patent 4,090,216 (May).
 
8
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
Epstein, R., Hallinan, P., and Yuille, A. 1995. 5 plus or minus 2 eigenimages suffice: An empirical investigation of low-dimensional lighting models. In IEEE Workshop on Physics-Based Modeling in Computer Vision. 108--116.
 
13
Fitzgibbon, J. J. 1982. Dimmer and Dimmer Override Control for a Display Device. United States Patent 4,355,334 (October).
 
14
 
15
Gibson, V. R. 1964. Automatic Brightness-Contrast Control Using Photoresistive Element to Control Brightness and AGC Voltages in Response to Ambient Light. United States Patent 3,147,341 (September).
 
16
Hallinan, P. 1994. A low-dimensional representation of human faces for arbitrary lighting conditions. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 995--999.
 
17
Heijligers, H. 1962. Circuit Arrangement for Automatically Adjusting the Brightness and the Contrast in a Television Receiver. United States Patent 3,027,421 (March).
 
18
 
19
Kochanski, G. P. 1998. Retro-Focus Type Lens and Projection-Type Display Apparatus. United States Patent 5,854,661 (December).
 
20
Korda, P. 1965. Automatic Contrast and Brilliance Control System for Television Receivers. United States Patent 3,165,582 (January).
 
21
Koudelka, M., Belhumeur, P., Magda, S., and Kriegman, D. 2001. Image-based modeling and rendering of surfaces with arbitrary BRDFs. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 568--575.
 
22
 
23
24
25
 
26
Miller, G. 1995. Volumetric hyper-reality, a computer graphics holy grail for the 21st century? In Graphics Interface '95. Quebec, Canada, 56--64.
 
27
Nayar, S. and Murase, H. 1994. The dimensionality of illumination manifolds in eigenspace. Tech. Rep. CUCS021-94, Columbia University, New York. August.
 
28
Nayar, S. K., Belhumeur, P. N., and Boult, T. E. 2001. Lighting sensitive display. In Technical Sketch, SIGGRAPH 01. Los Angeles.
 
29
 
30
Newman, A. J. 1972. Method and Means for Providing a Lighted Display Having a Constant Contrast Ratio. United States Patent 3,649,755 (March).
 
31
Nimeroff, J., Simoncelli, E., and Dorsey, J. 1994. Efficient re-rendering of naturally illuminated environments. In Fifth Eurographics Workshop on Rendering. 359--373.
 
32
Nishino, K., Sato, Y., and Ikeuchi, K. 1999. Eigen-texture method: Appearance compression based on 3D model. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 618--624.
 
33
Ottenstein, J. 1993. Arrangement for Automatically Controlling Brightness of Cockpit Displays. United States Patent 5,270,818 (December).
34
 
35
Prince, J. S., Herz, H. L., and Coleman, E. P. 1986. Brightness Control System for CRT Video Display. United States Patent 4,589,022 (May).
36
37
 
38
 
39
40
 
41
Smith, B. and Rowe, L. 1996. Compressed domain processing of JPEG encoded images. Real-Time Imaging 2 2, 2, 3--17.
 
42
Sunnybrook Technologies. 2003. High dynamic range displays. http://www.sunnybrook.com.
 
43
Szermy, N. 1968. Automatic Contrast and Brightness Control for Television Receiver Utilizing a Light Dependent Resistor. United States Patent 3,404,226 (October).
 
44
 
45
Thomas, L. P. 1963. Television Receiver Circuits. United States Patent 3,096,399 (July).
 
46
 
47
 
48
 
49
Yabuuchi, S. 1990. Display System with Luminance Calculation. United States Patent 4,952,917 (August).



REVIEW

"Christian Laforte : Reviewer"

This paper introduces the concept of a lighting sensitive display (LSD), a display that can render a three-dimensional (3D) scene such that it appears to be lit by the real environment surrounding it. The authors built a prototype LSD, which accur  more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Shree K. Nayar: colleagues
Peter N. Belhumeur: colleagues
Terry E. Boult: colleagues