Cognitive activities of abstraction in object orientation: an empirical study

ABSTRACT

Alongside the widespread support for adopting object orientation there are reports on difficulties in learning object oriented programming and design. This indicates the need for refining the research on cognitive difficulties in a way that will offer guidelines for better designing respective education. The presented findings of our study relate to general issues of object-oriented design and in particular to the abstraction issue with its various manifestations. Based on students' solutions we extracted a cognitive task analysis taxonomy regarding abstraction and inheritance. We discuss possible implications of our results for the teaching of object orientation and for further needed research.

REFERENCES

• 1: Bergen, J. Teaching Object-Oriented Analysis and Design in CS 1, http://csis.pace.edu/~bergin/papers/OOAD.html 1996.
• 2: Detienne, F. Assessing the cognitive consequences of the object-oriented approach: A survey of empirical research on object-oriented design by individuals and teams. Interacting with Computers, 9, (1997), 47--72.
• 3: Christian Holmboe, A cognitive framework for knowledge in informatics: the case of object-orientation, ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, v.31 n.3, p.17-20, Sept. 1999
• 4: Lewis, J. Myth about Object Orientation and its pedagogy. Journal of Computer Science Education, 14 (3 & 4), (2001), 22--26.
• 5: Philip Machanick, The abstraction-first approach to data abstraction and algorithms, Computers & Education, v.31 n.2, p.135-150, Sept. 1998 [doi>10.1016/S0360-1315(97)00064-X]
• 6: McLaughlin, P. "Oh, by the way, Java is object oriented..." http://www.ulst.ac.uk/cticomp/oh.html 1997.
• 7: Iain Milne , Glenn Rowe, Difficulties in Learning and Teaching Programming—Views of Students and Tutors, Education and Information Technologies, v.7 n.1, p.55-66, March 2002 [doi>10.1023/A:1015362608943]
• 8: Nguyen, M. and Wong, S. OOP in introductory CS: Better students through abstraction. Fifth workshop on pedagogies and tools for assimilating object-oriented concepts, in OOPSLA 2001.
• 9: Pennington, N., Lee, A. Y. and Rehder, B. Cognitive activities and levels of abstraction in procedural and object-oriented design. Human-Computer Interaction, 10 (1995) 171--226.
• 10: John Minor Ross , Huazhong Zhang, Structured programmers learning object-oriented programming: cognitive considerations, ACM SIGCHI Bulletin, v.29 n.4, p.93-99, Oct. 1997 [doi>10.1145/270950.270999]
• 11: Sim, E. R. and Wright G. The difficulties of learning object-oriented analysis and design: An exploratory study. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, (Winter 2001/2002).
• 12: Simon, M. Learning mathematics and learning to teach: learning cycles in mathematics teacher education, Educational studies in mathematics, 26, (1994), 71--94.
• 13: David P. Tegarden , Steven D. Sheetz, Cognitive activities in OO development, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, v.54 n.6, p.779-798, June 2001 [doi>10.1006/ijhc.1999.0462]

INDEX TERMS

Keywords:
abstraction, inheritance, object-oriented design, object-oriented programming, task analysis