ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Practical robust localization over large-scale 802.11 wireless networks
Full text PdfPdf (658 KB)
Source International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking archive
Proceedings of the 10th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking table of contents
Philadelphia, PA, USA
SESSION: Localization table of contents
Pages: 70 - 84  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-868-7
Authors
Andreas Haeberlen  Rice University
Eliot Flannery  Rice University
Andrew M. Ladd  Rice University
Algis Rudys  Rice University
Dan S. Wallach  Rice University
Lydia E. Kavraki  Rice University
Sponsors
SIGMOBILE: ACM Special Interest Group on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 35,   Downloads (12 Months): 193,   Citation Count: 39
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1023720.1023728
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We demonstrate a system built using probabilistic techniques that allows for remarkably accurate localization across our entire office building using nothing more than the built-in signal intensity meter supplied by standard 802.11 cards. While prior systems have required significant investments of human labor to build a detailed signal map, we can train our system by spending less than one minute per office or region, walking around with a laptop and recording the observed signal intensities of our building's unmodified base stations. We actually collected over two minutes of data per office or region, about 28 man-hours of effort. Using less than half of this data to train the localizer, we can localize a user to the precise, correct location in over 95% of our attempts, across the entire building. Even in the most pathological cases, we almost never localize a user any more distant than to the neighboring office. A user can obtain this level of accuracy with only two or three signal intensity measurements, allowing for a high frame rate of localization results. Furthermore, with a brief calibration period, our system can be adapted to work with previously unknown user hardware. We present results demonstrating the robustness of our system against a variety of untrained time-varying phenomena, including the presence or absence of people in the building across the day. Our system is sufficiently robust to enable a variety of location-aware applications without requiring special-purpose hardware or complicated training and calibration procedures.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
G. Abowd, K. Lyons, and K. Scott. The Rhino project, Aug. 1998. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/fce/uvid/rhino.html.
 
2
 
3
The ACX100/ACX111 wireless network driver project. http://acx100.sourceforge.net.
 
4
P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan. Enhancements to the RADAR user location and tracking system. Technical Report MSR-TR-2000-12, Microsoft Research, Feb. 2000.
 
5
P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan. RADAR: An in-building RF-based user location and tracking system. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), volume 2, pages 775--784, Tel Aviv, Israel, Mar. 2000.
 
6
 
7
N. Bulusu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin. GPS-less low-cost outdoor localization for very small devices. IEEE Personal Communications Magazine, 7(5):28--34, Oct. 2000.
 
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
H. Choset and K. Nagatani. Topological simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM): Toward exact localization without explicit localization. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 17(2):125--137, Apr. 2001.
 
12
I. Cox. Blanche - An experiment in guidance and navigation of an autonomous robot vehicle. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 7(2):193--204, 1991.
 
13
 
14
A. K. Dey, G. D. Abowd, and D. Salber. A context-based infrastructure for smart environments. In Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Managing Interactions in Smart Environments, Dublin, Ireland, Dec. 1999.
 
15
 
16
Ekahau, Inc. website. http://www.ekahau.com/.
 
17
Federal Communications Commission Report and Order 96-264: Revision of the commission's rules to ensure compatibility with Enhanced 911 emergency calling systems, July 1996. http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Wireless/Orders/1996/fcc96264.txt.
 
18
 
19
D. Fox, W. Burgard, and S. Thrun. Markov localization for mobile robots in dynamic environments. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, (JAIR), 11:391--427, Nov. 1999.
 
20
Y. Gwon, R. Jain, and T. Kawahara. Robust indoor location estimation of stationary and mobile users. In Proceedings The 23rd Conference of the IEEE Communications Society (INFOCOM), Hong Kong, Mar. 2004.
21
 
22
 
23
J. Hightower, R. Want, and G. Borriello. SpotON: An indoor 3D location sensing technology based on RF signal strength. Technical Report UW CSE 00-02-02, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, Feb. 2000.
24
25
 
26
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. ANSI/IEEE Standard 802.11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, 1999.
27
 
28
 
29
J. Krumm and J. Platt. Minimizing calibration effort for an indoor 802.11 device location measurement system. Technical Report MSR-TR-2003-82, Microsoft Research, Seattle, WA, Nov. 2003.
 
30
B. Kuipers and Y.-T. Byun. A robot exploration and mapping strategy based on a semantic hierarchy of spatial representations. Journal of Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 8(1--2):47--63, Nov. 1991.
31
 
32
S. Lenser and M. Veloso. Sensor resetting localization for poorly modelled mobile robots. In Proceedings of ICRA-2000, The International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Detroit, MI, Apr. 2000.
 
33
T. Liu, P. Bahl, and I. Chlamtac. Mobility modeling, location tracking, and trajectory prediction in wireless ATM networks. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, 16(6):922--936, Aug. 1998.
 
34
T. Logsdon. Understanding the Navstar: GPS, GIS and IVHS. Second edition. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1995.
35
 
36
R. Nagpal, H. Shrobe, and J. Bachrach. Organizing a global coordinate system from local information on an ad hoc sensor network. In Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks (IPSN), Palo Alto, CA, Apr. 2003.
 
37
D. Niculescu and B. Nath. Ad hoc positioning system (APS) using AOA. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM), San Francisco, CA, Mar. 2003.
 
38
D. Niculescu and B. Nath. DV based positioning in ad hoc networks. Kluwer Journal of Telecommunication Systems, 22(1--4):267--280, Jan. 2003.
39
40
41
 
42
 
43
T. Roos, P. Myllymaki, H. Tirri, P. Misikangas, and J. Sievanan. A probabilistic approach to WLAN user location estimation. International Journal of Wireless Information Networks, 9(3), July 2002.
44
 
45
A. Smailagic, D. Siewiorek, J. Anhalt, D. Kogan, and Y. Wang. Location sensing and privacy in a context aware computing environment. Pervasive Computing, 2001.
 
46
J. Small, A. Smailagic, and D. P. Siewiorek. Determining user location for context aware computing through the use of a wireless LAN infrastructure, Dec. 2000. http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~aura/docdir/small00.pdf.
 
47
C. Steger, P. Radosavljevic, and P. Frantz. 802.11b operating in a mobile channel: Performance and challenges. In Communications Design Conference, San Jose, CA, Sept. 2003.
48
 
49
S. Thrun. Probabilistic algorithms in robotics. AI Magazine, 21(4):93--109, 2000.
 
50
S. Thrun and A. Bucken. Integrating grid-based and topological maps for mobile robot navigation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Portland, Oregon, Aug. 1996.
 
51
S. Thrun and A. Bucken. Learning maps for indoor mobile robot navigation. Technical Report CMU-CS-96-121, Carnegie Mellon University, Computer Science Department, Pittsburgh, PA, Apr. 1996.
 
52
 
53
 
54
55
 
56
A. Ward, A. Jones, and A. Hopper. A new location technique for the active office. IEEE Personal Communications, 4(5):42--47, Oct. 1997.
 
57
R. Yamamoto, H. Matsutani, H. Matsuki, T. Oono, and H. Ohtsuka. Position location technologies using signal strength in cellular systems. In Proc. of the 53rd IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference, Rhodes, Greece, May 2001.
 
58

CITED BY  39


REVIEW

"Jiyong Ma : Reviewer"

Automatic localization of mobile devices is an important research area in context-aware mobile computing, one that seeks to provide information about user and mobile device states, including the characteristics of the surrounding environment, and   more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Andreas Haeberlen: colleagues
Eliot Flannery: colleagues
Andrew M. Ladd: colleagues
Algis Rudys: colleagues
Dan S. Wallach: colleagues
Lydia E. Kavraki: colleagues