|
ABSTRACT
Latency during handoffs affects the service quality of real-time applications. This paper describes the Mobile IP Fast Authentication protocol (MIFA) and introduces a simple analytical performance model to evaluate this protocol compared to Mobile IP (MIP) and Hierarchical Mobile IP (HMIP). Our performance study shows that the handoff latency of MIFA is independent of the distance between the current Foreign Agent (current FA) and the Home Agent (HA). Thus, MIFA highly reduces the handoff latency for most cases. MIFA clearly outperforms MIP with respect to the handoff latency and the number of packets dropped due to handoffs. In addition, MIFA performs similar to HMIP when the MN moves within a domain consisting of two hierarchy levels only and outperforms HMIP otherwise. Different from HMIP, MIFA does not require additional network elements as HMIP does. Thus, MIFA conforms to the standard MIP approach and the IP philosophy to confine host-specific processing to the end systems as much as possible.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
|
| |
2
|
C. Perkins, Ed. IP Mobility Support for IPv4. RFC: 3344 August 2002.
|
| |
3
|
David B. Johnson, N. Asokan. Registration Keys for Route Optimization. < draft-ietf-mobileip-regkey-03.txt >. 14 July 2000.
|
| |
4
|
Charles E. Perkins, Pat R. Calhoun. Generalized Key Distribution Extensions for Mobile IP. draft-ietf-mobileip-gen-key-00.txt. 2 July 2001
|
| |
5
|
Gopal Dommety, Tao Ye. Local and Indirect Registration for Anchoring Handoffs. < draft-dommety-mobileip-anchor-handoff-01.txt >. July 2000.
|
| |
6
|
Eva Gustafsson, Annika Jonsson, Charles E. Perkins. Mobile IPv4 Regional Registration. < draft-ietf-mobileip-reg-tunnel-08.txt >, November 2003.
|
| |
7
|
K. El Malki et al. Low Latency Handoffs in Mobile IPv4. draft-ietf-mobileip-lowlatency-handoffs-v4-04.txt,June 2002.
|
| |
8
|
C. Blondia, O. Casals, L1. Cerda, N. Van den Wijngaert, G. Willems, P. De- Cleyn. Low Latency Handoff Mechanisms and Their Implementation in an IEEE 802.11 Network. Proceedings of ITC18, Berlin, Germany, 2003.
|
| |
9
|
O. Casals, L1. Cerda, G. Willems, C. Blondia, N. Van den Wijngaert. Performance Evaluation of the Post-Registration Method, a Low Latency Handoff in MIPV4. Proceedings of IEEE 2003 International Confernence on Communications (ICC 2003), Anchorage, May 2003.
|
| |
10
|
C. Blondia, O. Casals, L1. Cerda, N. Van den Wijngaert, G. Willems, P. De-Cleyn. Performance Comparison of Low Latency Mobile IP Schemes. Proceedings at WiOpt'03 Modeling and Optimization in Mobile Ad Hoc and Wireless Networks, INRIA, Sophia Antipolis, pp. 115--124, March 2003.
|
| |
11
|
A. Diab, A. Mitschele-Thiel. Minimizing Mobile IP Handoff Latency. 2nd International Working Conference on Performance modelling and Evaluation of Heterogeneous Networks (HET-NETs'04), Ilkley, West Yorkshire, U.K., July 26 -- 28, 2004.
|
| |
12
|
S. Pack, Y. Choi. Fast Inter-AP Handoff using Predictive-Authentication Scheme in a Public Wireless LAN. Networks 2002, Aug. 2002.
|
| |
13
|
|
| |
14
|
R. Boringer. MPLS-base Traffic Engineering in UMTS Networks.Diploma theses, TU-Ilmenau, November 2003.
|
| |
15
|
H. Krawczyk, M. Bellare, R. Canetti, HMAC: Keyed-Hashing for Message Authentication, RFC: 2104 , Feb, 1997.
|
CITED BY
|
|
Ali Diab , Florian Liers , Andreas Mitschele-Thiel, Performance analysis of mobility management protocols using a generic mathematical model, Proceedings of the 10th ACM Symposium on Modeling, analysis, and simulation of wireless and mobile systems, October 22-26, 2007, Chania, Crete Island, Greece
|
|