Auditing elections

Subscribe (Full Service)


	Search: The ACM Digital Library The Guide

	Feedback

Auditing elections

Full text

Html (28 KB), Pdf

Pdf (153 KB)

Source

Communications of the ACM archive
Volume 47 , Issue 10 (October 2004) table of contents
Voting systems

SPECIAL ISSUE: The problems and potentials of voting systems table of contents

Pages: 46 - 50

Year of Publication: 2004

ISSN:0001-0782

Author

Douglas W. Jones

University of Iowa and the Iowa Board of Examiners for Voting Machines and Electronic Voting Systems

Publisher

ACM New York, NY, USA

Bibliometrics

Downloads (6 Weeks): 7, Downloads (12 Months): 70, Citation Count: 0

Additional Information:

abstract references index terms collaborative colleagues

Tools and Actions:	Request Permissions Review this Article Save this Article to a Binder Display Formats: BibTeX EndNote ACM Ref

DOI Bookmark:	Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1022594.1022622 What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Exploiting the redundancy in election records to conduct useful audits and improve the system design process.

REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

	1	Adler, J. Confidence: What it is and how to achieve it. NIST Symposium on Building Trust and Confidence in Voting Systems. December 2003, Gaithersburg, MD; www.votehere.net/papers/NIST_121003.pdf.
	2	Arizona Revised Statutes, 2003. Title 16, Chapter 5, Article 12, Section 16-664---Recount of votes by automatic tabulating system; www.azleg.state.az.us/ArizonaRevisedStatutes.asp.
	3	California Elections Code, 2003. Chapter 4---Official canvass, Section 15302---General provisions; www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html.
	4	California Elections Code, 2003. Chapter 4---Official canvass, Section 15360---One percent manual tally; www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html.
	5	Colorado Revised Statutes, 2003. Title 1, Article 10.5, Section 108---Method of recount; www.state.co.us/gov_dir/leg_dir/geninfo.htm.
	6	Federal Election Commission. 2002 Voting System Standards, Volume I. Section 2.2.5, System audit; fecweb1.fec.gov/pages/vss/vss.html.
	7	Federal Election Commission. 2002 Voting System Standards, Volume II. Section 5.2, Basis of software testing; fecweb1.fec.gov/pages/vss/vss.html.
	8	Hargrove, T. Voter totals often not known. Cincinatti Post. (Dec. 12, 2000); www.cincypost.com/news/2000/undsid120500.html.
	9	Iowa Code, 2003 Supplement. Section 39A.3, Election misconduct in the second degree; www.legis.state.ia.us/IACODE/2003SUPPLEMENT/39A/3.html.
	10	Procedures at a General Election. Department for Constitutional Affairs, London, August 2001; www.dca.gov.uk/elections/ge2001/procedures/.
	11	Schoenmakers, B. Fully auditable electronic secret-ballot elections. Xootic. July 2000; www.win.tue.nl/xootic/magazine/jul-2000/schoenmakers.pdf.