ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Perfect Storm: The Insider, Naivety, and Hostility
Full text HtmlHtml (27 KB),  PdfPdf (956 KB)
Source
Queue archive
Volume 2 ,  Issue 4  (June 2004) table of contents
Surviving Network Attacks
FEATURE: Q focus: Security table of contents
Pages: 58 - 65  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:1542-7730
Authors
Herbert H Thompson  Security Innovation
Richard Ford  Florida Institute of Technology
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 108,   Downloads (12 Months): 388,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   review   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1016978.1016983
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Every year corporations and government installations spend millions of dollars fortifying their network infrastructures. Firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and antivirus products stand guard at network boundaries, and individuals monitor countless logs and sensors for even the subtlest hints of network penetration. Vendors and IT managers have focused on keeping the wily hacker outside the network perimeter, but very few technological measures exist to guard against insidersthose entities that operate inside the fortified network boundary. The 2002 CSI/FBI survey estimates that 70 percent of successful attacks come from the inside. Several other estimates place those numbers even higher.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
1. Power, R. 2002 CSI/FBI computer crime and security survey. Computer Security Issues and Trends VIII, 1 (Spring 2002).
 
2
2. Hayden, M. V. The Insider Threat to U. S. Government Information Systems. Report from NSTISSAM INFOSEC /1-99, July 1999.
 
3
3. Ferrie, P., and Lee, T. Analysis of W32.Mydoom.A@mm; http://securityresponse.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/ data/w32.novarg.a@mm.html.
 
4
4. Bridwell, L., and Tippett, P. ICSA Labs 7th Annual Computer Virus Prevalence Survey 2001. ICSA Labs, 2001.
 
5
5. See, for example, Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03- 050, Vulnerability in Microsoft Word and Microsoft Excel Could Allow Arbitrary Code To Run: http: //www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/MS03- 050.mspx; or MS03-035, Flaws in Microsoft Word Could Enable Macros To Run Automatically: http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ MS03-035.mspx.
 
6
6. Dos Santos, A., Vigna, G., and Kemmerer, R. Security testing of the online banking service of a large international bank. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Security and Privacy in E-Commerce (Nov. 2000).
 
7
7. Sophos Corporation. Top ten viruses reported to Sophos in 2003; http://www.sophos.com/virusinfo/ topten/200312summary.html.


REVIEW

"George Michael White : Reviewer"

Troy was taken from the inside. The story of the Trojan horse, known to us for more then two millennia, has endured for a long time. It tells of a universal threat, that of attack from inside the walls.

Network administrators have long been   more...

Collaborative Colleagues:
Herbert H Thompson: colleagues
Richard Ford: colleagues