ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Is your caching resolver polluting the internet?
Full text PdfPdf (105 KB)
Source Applications, Technologies, Architectures, and Protocols for Computer Communication archive
Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM workshop on Network troubleshooting: research, theory and operations practice meet malfunctioning reality table of contents
Portland, Oregon, USA
SESSION: Miscellaneous II table of contents
Pages: 271 - 276  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-942-9
Author
Duane Wessels  CAIDA & The Measurement Factory, Inc.
Sponsors
SIGCOMM: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 21,   Citation Count: 4
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1016687.1016695
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Previous research has shown that most of the DNS queries reaching the root of the hierarchy are bogus [1]. This behavior derives from two constraints on the system: (1) queries that cannot be satisfied locally percolate up to the root of the DNS; (2) some caching nameservers are behind packet filters or firewalls that allow outgoing queries but block incoming replies. These resolvers assume the network failure is temporary and retransmit their queries, often aggressively.DNS pollution may not be causing any perceivable performance problems. The root servers seem well equipped to handle the load. Since DNS messages are small, the pollution does not contribute significantly to the total traffic generated by most organizations. Nonetheless, this paper provides a few reasons why network operators should take the time to investigate and fix these problems.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Duane Wessels and Marina Fomenkov, "Wow, That's a Lot of Packets," in Proc. 2003 Passive and Active Measurements Workshop, April 2003.
2
 
3
Evi Nemeth, k claffy, and Nevil Brownlee, "DNS Measurements at a Root Server," in Proc. IEEE Globecom, 2001.
 
4
Duane Wessels, Marina Fomenkov, and Nevil Brownlee, "Measurements and Laboratory Simulations of the Upper DNS Hierarchy," in Proc. 2004 Passive and Active Measurements Workshop, April 2004.
 
5
Joe Abley, "Hierarchical Anycast for Global Service Distribution," 2003.
 
6
Daniel J. Bernstein, "djbdns," June 2003, http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html.
 
7
Y. Rekhter, B. Moskowitz, D. Karrenber, G. J. de Groot, and E. Lear, "RFC 1918: Address Allocation for Private Internets," February 1996.
 
8
"The AS 112 Pro ject," http://www.as112.net.
 
9
Mark Andrews, "Negative Caching of DNS Queries (DNS NCACHE)," March 1998, Request For Comments 2038.
 
10
Internet Software Consortium, "Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) website," http://www.isc.org/sw/bind/.
 
11
 
12
Duane Wessels, "dnstop," http://dnstop.measurement- factory.com.
 
13
 
14
P. Vixie, S. Thompson, Y. Rekhter, and J. Bound, "Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE)," April 1997, Request For Comments 2136.
 
15
P. Mockapetris, "Domain Names--Concepts and Facilities," November 1987, Internet Standard 0013 (RFCs 1034, 1035).
 
16
J. Jung, E. Sit, H. Balakrishnan, and R. Morris, "DNS Performance and the Effectiveness of Caching," 2001, http://www.sds.lcs.mit.edu/papers/dns-imw2001.html