ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
A kernel view of the dimensionality reduction of manifolds
Full text PdfPdf (2.28 MB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 69 archive
Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Banff, Alberta, Canada
Page: 47  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-828-5
Authors
Jihun Ham  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Daniel D. Lee  University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
Sebastian Mika  Fraunhofer FIRST.IDA, Berlin, Germany
Bernhard Schölkopf  Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 18,   Downloads (12 Months): 109,   Citation Count: 21
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1015330.1015417
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

We interpret several well-known algorithms for dimensionality reduction of manifolds as kernel methods. Isomap, graph Laplacian eigenmap, and locally linear embedding (LLE) all utilize local neighborhood information to construct a global embedding of the manifold. We show how all three algorithms can be described as kernel PCA on specially constructed Gram matrices, and illustrate the similarities and differences between the algorithms with representative examples.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Aldous, D., & Fill, J. (2002). Reversible Markov chains and random walks on graphs. In preparation.
 
2
 
3
Bengio, Y., Paiement, J.-F., & Vincent, P. (2004). Out-of-sample extension for lle, isomap, mds, eigenmaps, and spectral clustering. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15. MIT Press.
 
4
 
5
Cox, T., & Cox, M. (1994). Multidimensional scaling. London: Chapman and Hall.
 
6
de Silva, V., & Tenenbaum, J. (2002). Global versus local methods in nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 15.
 
7
Grimes, C., & Donoho, D. (2002). When does isomap recover the natural parameterization of families of articulated images? (Technical Report 27). Stanford University.
 
8
 
9
Roweis, S., & Saul, L. (2000). Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science, 290, 2323--2326.
 
10
 
11
Schölkpf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2002). Learning with kernels. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
 
12
Tenenbaum, J., de Silva, V., & Langford, J. (2000). A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science, 290, 2319--2323.
 
13
 
14
Williams, C. K. I. (2001). On a connection between kernel PCA and metric multidimensional scaling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13. MIT Press.

CITED BY  21
Collaborative Colleagues:
Jihun Ham: colleagues
Daniel D. Lee: colleagues
Sebastian Mika: colleagues
Bernhard Schölkopf: colleagues