ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Solving cluster ensemble problems by bipartite graph partitioning
Full text PdfPdf (136 KB)
Source ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 69 archive
Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning table of contents
Banff, Alberta, Canada
Page: 36  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-828-5
Authors
Xiaoli Zhang Fern  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Carla E. Brodley  Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 147,   Citation Count: 12
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1015330.1015414
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

A critical problem in cluster ensemble research is how to combine multiple clusterings to yield a final superior clustering result. Leveraging advanced graph partitioning techniques, we solve this problem by reducing it to a graph partitioning problem. We introduce a new reduction method that constructs a bipartite graph from a given cluster ensemble. The resulting graph models both instances and clusters of the ensemble simultaneously as vertices in the graph. Our approach retains all of the information provided by a given ensemble, allowing the similarity among instances and the similarity among clusters to be considered collectively in forming the final clustering. Further, the resulting graph partitioning problem can be solved efficiently. We empirically evaluate the proposed approach against two commonly used graph formulations and show that it is more robust and achieves comparable or better performance in comparison to its competitors.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Bach, F. R., & Jordan, M. I. (2004). Learning spectral clustering. NIPS 16.
 
2
Blake, C. L., & Merz, C. J. (1998). UCI repository of machine learning databases. http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html.
 
3
4
5
 
6
 
7
Dudoit, S., & Fridlyand, J. (2003). Bagging to improve the accuracy of a clustering procedure. Bioinformatics, 19.
 
8
Dy, J. G., Brodley, C. E., Kak, A., Shyu, C., & Broderick, L. S. (1999). The customized-queries approach to CBIR using EM. CVPR.
 
9
Fern, X. Z., & Brodley, C. E. (2003). Random projection for high dimensional data clustering: A cluster ensemble approach. ICML.
 
10
Fjallstrom, P. (1998). Algorithms for graph partitioning: A survey. Linkoping Electronic Articles in Computer and Information Science, 3.
 
11
Fred, A. L. N., & Jain, A. K. (2002). Data clustering using evidence accumulation. ICPR.
 
12
Hagen, L., & Kahng, A. (1992). New spectral methods for ratio cut partitioning and clustering. IEEE transaction on CAD, 11, 1074--1085.
 
13
 
14
 
15
Ng, A., Jordan, M., & Weiss, Y. (2002). On spectral clustering: Analysis and an algorithm. NIPS 14.
 
16
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
Topchy, A., Jain, A. K., & Punch, W. (2004). A mixture model for clustering ensembles. Proc. of SIAM Conf. on Data Mining.

CITED BY  12
Collaborative Colleagues:
Xiaoli Zhang Fern: colleagues
Carla E. Brodley: colleagues