ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Locating secret messages in images
Full text PdfPdf (474 KB)
Source International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining archive
Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining table of contents
Seattle, WA, USA
POSTER SESSION: Research track posters table of contents
Pages: 545 - 550  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-888-1
Authors
Ian Davidson  SUNY Albany, Albany, NY
Goutam Paul  SUNY Albany, Albany, NY
Sponsors
SIGMOD: ACM Special Interest Group on Management of Data
SIGKDD: ACM Special Interest Group on Knowledge Discovery in Data
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 19,   Downloads (12 Months): 107,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1014052.1014117
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Steganography involves hiding messages in innocuous media such as images, while steganalysis is the field of detecting these secret messages. The ultimate goal of steganalysis is two-fold: making a binary classification of a file as stego-bearing or innocent, and secondly, locating the hidden message with an aim to extracting, sterilizing or manipulating it. Almost all steganalysis approaches (known as attacks) focus on the first of these two issues. In this paper, we explore the difficult related problem: given that we know an image file contains steganography, locate which pixels contain the message. We treat the hidden message location problem as outlier detection using probability/energy measures of images motivated by the image restoration community. Pixels contributing the most to the energy calculations of an image are deemed outliers. Typically, of the top third of one percent of most energized pixels (outliers), we find that 87% are stego-bearing in color images and 61% in grayscale images. In all image types only 1% of all pixels are stego-bearing indicating our techniques provides a substantial lift over random guessing.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
 
2
Johnson, N., Duric, Z., and Jajodia, S. Information Hiding: Steganography and Watermarking, 2001.
 
3
Starr, B., and Utley, G. CNN, July 23, 2002: http://www.cnn.com/2002/US/07/23/binladen.internet
 
4
 
5
Kelley, J. USA Today, July 10, 2002: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002/07/10/web-terror-cover.htm
 
6
Provos, N. Defending against Statistical Steganalysis. Proc. 10th USENIX Security Symposium, 2001.
 
7
 
8
 
9
Berg, G., Davidson, I., Duan, M., and Paul, G., Searching for Hidden Messages: Automatic Detection of Steganography. 15th Innovative App. of A.I., 2003, 51--56.
 
10
Fridrich, J., and Goljan, M. Practical Steganalysis of Digital Images - State of the Art. Proc. SPIE Photonics West, Vol. 4675, 2002, 1--13
 
11
12
 
13
 
14
Knorr, E. M., and Ng, R. T. A unified notion of outliers: Properties and computation, Proc. KDD, 1997, 219--222.
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
Neal, R. Probabilistic Inference Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo Method, TR CRG-TR-93-1, U. of Toronto.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Ian Davidson: colleagues
Goutam Paul: colleagues