ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Active mode leakage reduction using fine-grained forward body biasing strategy
Full text PdfPdf (183 KB)
Source
International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design archive
Proceedings of the 2004 international symposium on Low power electronics and design table of contents
Newport Beach, California, USA
SESSION: Leakage analysis and optimization table of contents
Pages: 150 - 155  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-929-2
Authors
Vishal Khandelwal  University of Maryland at College Park
Ankur Srivastava  University of Maryland at College Park
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGDA: ACM Special Interest Group on Design Automation
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 0,   Downloads (12 Months): 19,   Citation Count: 1
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1013235.1013277
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Leakage power minimization has become an important issue with technology scaling. Variable threshold voltage schemes have become popular for standby power reduction. In this work we look at another emerging aspect of this potent problem which is leakage power reduction in active mode of operation. In gate level circuits, a large number of gates are not switching in active mode at any given point in time but nevertheless are consuming leakage power. We propose a fine-grained Forward Body Biasing (FBB) Scheme for active mode leakage power reduction in gate level circuits without any delay penalty. Our results show that our optimal polynomial time FBB allocation scheme results in 70.2% reduction in leakage currents. We also present a novel placement-driven FBB allocation algorithm that effectively reduces the area penalty using the post-placement area slack and results in 39.7%, 64.7% and 67.1% reduction in leakage currents for 0%, 4% and 8% area slack respectively.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

1
 
2
A. J. Bhavnagarwala et al. "Dynamic-Threshold CMOS SRAM Cells for Fast, Portable Applications". In ASIC/SOC Conference, pages 359--363, 2000.
 
3
 
4
Ali Keshavarzi et al. "Forward body Bias for Microprocessors in 130nm Technology Generation and Beyond". In VLSI Circuits Symp., pages 312--315, 2002.
5
6
7
 
8
E.M. Sentovich, K.J. Singh, L. Lavagno, C. Moon, R. Murgai, A. Saldanha, H. Savoj, P.R. Stephan, R.K. Brayton, A.L. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. SIS: A System for Sequential Circuit Synthesis. Memorandum No. UCB/ERL M92/41, Department of EECS. UC Berkeley, May 1992.
 
9
H. Kawaguchi et al. "Dynamic Leakage Cut-Off Scheme for Low-Voltage SRAM's". In VLSI Circuits Symp., pages 140--141, 1998.
 
10
R. Gu and M. Elmasry. "Power Dissipation Analysis and Optimization of Deep Submicron CMOS Digital Circuits". In IEEE JSSC, May 1996.
11
 
12
S. Narendra et al. "1.1V 1GHz Communications Router with On-Chip Body Bias in 150nm CMOS". In ISSCC, 2002.
 
13
T. Sakurai and A.R. Newton. "A Simple MOSFET Model for Circuit Analysis". In IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, April 1991.
 
14
Y. Taur et al. "25 nm CMOS Design Considerations". In IEDM, pages 789--792, 1998.


Collaborative Colleagues:
Vishal Khandelwal: colleagues
Ankur Srivastava: colleagues