Intimate objects

ABSTRACT

We present a preliminary and ongoing study into intimate objects: technological devices for maintaining intimacy at a distance. We use the notion of critical technical practice to provide a theoretical framework on which to base our designs, building devices that differ from mass communication devices in three ways: they are for couples in a relationship to communicate with each other, not with everybody else, they are for a specific couple to use, not a generic couple, and they are for the transmission of specific intimate communication, not all-purpose communication.We present an overview of the study, give some examples of intimate object sketches produced by our subjects, and discuss questions posed by the study, particularly those concerning the generalizability of the results.

REFERENCES

• 1: Philip E. Agre, Computation and Human Experience, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1997
• 2: Bell, Genevieve, Brooke, Tim, Churchill, Elizabeth, and Paulos, Eric, (eds). Full Workshop Proceedings: Intimate Ubiquitous Computing, Ubicomp 2003. Available at www.intimateornot.com, 2003.
• 3: Brooks, Rodney. A Robust Layered Control System for a Mobile Robot. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation, RA-2:14-23, April 1986.
• 4: Crampton Smith, G. The Hand That Rocks the Cradle. I.D. Magazine, May/June 1995, pp. 60--65.
• 5: William W. Gaver , Jacob Beaver , Steve Benford, Ambiguity as a resource for design, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/642611.642653]
• 6: Hilary Hutchinson , Wendy Mackay , Bo Westerlund , Benjamin B. Bederson , Allison Druin , Catherine Plaisant , Michel Beaudouin-Lafon , Stéphane Conversy , Helen Evans , Heiko Hansen , Nicolas Roussel , Björn Eiderbäck, Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families, Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, April 05-10, 2003, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA [doi>10.1145/642611.642616]
• 7: Joseph Jofish Kaye, Making Scents: aromatic output for HCI, interactions, v.11 n.1, p.48-61, January + February 2004 [doi>10.1145/962342.964333]
• 8: McCarthy, John, Peter Wright, Jayne Wallace, and Andrew Dearden. The Experience of Enchantment in Human-Computer Interaction. CHI Fringe, 2004.
• 9: Penny, Simon. "Embodied cultural agents at the intersection of robotics, cognitive science, and interactive art." In Kerstin Dautenhahn, ed., Socially Intelligent Agents: Papers from the 1997 Fall Symposium, p103-105, Menlo Park, 1997. AAAI Press. Technical Report FS-97-02.
• 10: Schoen, D. A., The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books, New York, 1983.
• 11: Sengers, Phoebe. Practices for Machine Culture: A Case Study of Integrating Cultural Theory and Artificial Intelligence. Surfaces Volume VIII 1999.
• 12: Sengers, Phoebe, Joseph Kaye, Kirsten Boehner, Jeremiah Fairbank, Geri Gay, Eugene Medynskiy, and Susan Wyche. Culturally Embedded Computing. (2004) IEEE Pervasive Computing, Special Issue on Art & Design, 14-21, March-April 2004.
• 13: Strong, R. and Gaver, W. Feather, Scent and Shaker: Supporting Simple Intimacy in Videos. In Proceedings of CSCW '96, ACM Press, New York NY 1996, 29--30.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.2 User Interfaces (D.2.2, H.1.2, I.3.6)

General Terms:
Design

Keywords:
couples, intimacy, intimate objects, participatory design, reflective design