|
ABSTRACT
Many methods for representing software components for reuse have been proposed. These include traditional library and information science methods, knowledge based methods, and hypertext. There has been no empirical evaluation of these methods, and consequently there is no data about their relative costs and effectiveness. Proteus is an experimental reuse library system that will be used to help gather such data. Reuse library systems are usually tied to one method---Proteus supports multiple methods.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
{BOO86} Booch, G. (1986), <i>Software Components with Ada: Structures, Tools, and Subsystems,</i> Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
|
| |
2
|
|
| |
3
|
|
 |
4
|
W. B. Frakes , P. B. Gandel, Representation methods for software reuse, Proceedings of the conference on Tri-Ada '89: Ada technology in context: application, development, and deployment, p.302-314, January 1989, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
[doi> 10.1145/74261.74283]
|
| |
5
|
|
| |
6
|
{KAT83} Katzer, J., McGill, M., Tessier, J., Frakes, W., and Das Gupta, P. (1983). "A Study of the Overlaps among Document Representations", <i>Information Technology: Research and Development,</i> (January).
|
| |
7
|
|
| |
8
|
|
| |
9
|
|
CITED BY 6
|
|
Michael L. Creech , Dennis F. Freeze , Martin L. Griss, Using hypertext in selecting reusable software components, Proceedings of the third annual ACM conference on Hypertext, p.25-38, December 15-18, 1991, San Antonio, Texas, United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|