Effects of rendering on shape perception in automobile design

ABSTRACT

The goal of this project was to determine if advanced rendering methods such as global illumination allow more accurate discrimination of shape differences than standard rendering methods such as OpenGL.To address these questions, we conducted two psychophysical experiments to measure observers' sensitivity to shape differences between a physical model and rendered images of the model. Two results stand out:• The rendering method used has a significant effect on the ability to discriminate shape. In particular, under the conditions tested, global illumination rendering improves sensitivity to shape differences.• Further, viewpoint appears to have an effect on the ability to discriminate shape. In most of the cases studied, sensitivity to small shape variations was poorer when the rendering and model viewpoints were different.The results of this work have important implications for our understanding of human shape perception and for the development of rendering tools for computer-aided design.

REFERENCES

• 1: BLAKE, A. AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1991). Shape from specularities: computation and psychophysics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (London) Series B 331, 237--252.
• 2: CHRISTOU, C., KOENDERINK, J. J, AND VANDOORN A. J. (1996). Surface gradients, contours, and the perception of surface attitude in images of complex scenes. Perception, 25, 701--713.
• 3: Stephen R. Ellis, Pictorial communication in virtual and real environments, Taylor & Francis, Inc., Bristol, PA, 1991
• 4: ERENS, R. G.F., KAPPERS, A.M.L., AND KOENDERINK, J. J. (1993). Perception of local shape from shading. Perception and Pyshcophysics, 54(2), 145--156.
• 5: FLEMING, R. W., DROR, R. O. AND ADELSON, E. H. (2003). Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties. Journal of Vision, 3(5), 347--368.
• 6: HAGEN, M. A. (1980). The perception of pictures. Academic Press, New York.
• 7: INTERRANTE, V. (1998). Perceiving and representing shape and depth. In. V. Interrante (Ed.) Applications of visual perception in computer graphics, Course 32, Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1998, 1--27.
• 8: KUBOVY, M. (1986). The psychology of perspective and Renaissance art. Cambridge University Press, New York.
• 9: MADISON, C., THOMPSON, W., KERSTEN, D., SHIRLEY, P. AND SMITS, B. (2001). Use of interreflection and shadow for surface contact. Perception and Psychophysics, 63, 187--194.
• 10: Ann McNamara , Alan Chalmers , Tom Troscianko , Iain Gilchrist, Comparing Real & Synthetic Scenes using Human Judgements of Lightness, Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques 2000, p.207-218, June 26-28, 2000
• 11: Gary W. Meyer , Holly E. Rushmeier , Michael F. Cohen , Donald P. Greenberg , Kenneth E. Torrance, An experimental evaluation of computer graphics imagery, ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), v.5 n.1, p.30-50, Jan. 1986 [doi>10.1145/7529.7920]
• 12: MILLER, J. (1998). On reflection. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.
• 13: NORMAN, J. F., TODD, J. T., AND PHILLIPS, F. (1995). The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of information. Perception and Psychophysics, 57(5), 629--636.
• 14: NORMAN, J. F., ORBAN, G., AND TODD, J. T. (2004, In press). Perception of 3-D shape from specular highlights and deformations of shading. Psychological Science.
• 15: PALMER, S. E. (1999). Vision science: photons to phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
• 16: Fabio Pellacini , James A. Ferwerda , Donald P. Greenberg, Toward a psychophysically-based light reflection model for image synthesis, Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.55-64, July 2000 [doi>10.1145/344779.344812]
• 17: RAMACHANDRAN, V. S. (1988). Perception of shape from shading. Nature, 331, 163--166.
• 18: James C. Rodger , Roger A. Browse, Choosing Rendering Parameters for Effective Communication of 3D Shape, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, v.20 n.2, p.20-28, March 2000 [doi>10.1109/38.824528]
• 19: RUSHMEIER, H. E., WARD, G., PIATKO, C., SANDERS, P., AND RUST, B., (1995). Comparing real and synthetic images: some ideas about metrics. Proceedings of the 6th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, 82--91.
• 20: TODD, J. T. AND MINGOLLA E. (1983). Perception of surface curvature and direction of illumination from patterns of shading. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 9(4), 583--595.
• 21: TODD, J. T. AND REICHEL, F. D. (1989). Ordinal structure in the visual perception and cognition of smoothly curved surfaces. Psychological Review, 96(4), 643--657.
• 22: Eric Veach , Leonidas J. Guibas, Metropolis light transport, Proceedings of the 24th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.65-76, August 1997 [doi>10.1145/258734.258775]
• 23: Gregory J. Ward, Measuring and modeling anisotropic reflection, Proceedings of the 19th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.265-272, July 1992

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.7 Three-Dimensional Graphics and Realism

Keywords:
fidelity, perception, rendering, shape