Visual motion influences locomotion in a treadmill virtual environment

ABSTRACT

This paper describes the use of a treadmill-based virtual environment (VE) to investigate the influence of visual motion on locomotion. First, we demonstrate that a computer-controlled treadmill coupled with a wide field of view computer graphics display can be used to study interactions between perception and action. Previous work has demonstrated that humans calibrate their visually-directed actions to changing circumstances in their environment. Using a treadmill VE, we show that calibration of action is reflected in the real world as a result of manipulating the relation between the speed of visual flow, presented using computer graphics, and the speed of walking on a treadmill. Second, we extend the methodology in our treadmill VE to investigate an open question involving human gait transitions and show that the speed of visual motion influences the speed at which the gait transition occurs. These results demonstrate both the effectiveness of treadmill-based VEs in simulating the perceptual-motor effects of walking through the real world and the value of such systems in addressing basic perceptual questions that would otherwise be difficult to explore.

REFERENCES

• 1: BANTON, T., STEFANUCCI, J., DURGIN, F. H., FASS, A., AND PROFFITT, D. submitted. Perception of walking speed in virtual environments.
• 2: DANIELS, G. L., AND NEWELL, K. M. 2002. Perceived task expectations and the walk--run gait transition. In 23rd Army Science Conference.
• 3: DANIELS, G. L., AND NEWELL, K. M. 2003. Attentional focus influences the walk-run transition in human locomotion. Biological Psychology 63, 2, 163--178.
• 4: DIEDRICH, F. J., AND WARREN, JR., W. H. 1995. Why change gaits? dynamics of the walk-run transition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21, 1, 183--202.
• 5: DIEDRICH, F. J., AND WARREN, J. W. H. 1998. The dynamics of gait transitions: Effects of grade and load. Journal of Motor Behavior 30, 1, 60--78.
• 6: DURGIN, F. H. FOX, L. F., LEWIS, J., AND WALLEY, K. A. 2002. Perceptuomotor adaptation: More than meets the eye. In Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, vol. 7, 103--104.
• 7: DURGIN, F. H., GIGONE, K., AND SCOTT, R. submitted. The perception of visual speed while moving.
• 8: HRELJAC, A. 1993. Preferred and energetically optimal gait transition speeds in human locomotion. Med. Sci. Sport Exer. 25, 1158--1162.
• 9: KAY, B. A., AND WARREN, JR., W. H. 2001. Coupling of posture and gait: Mode locking and parametric excitation. Biological Cybernetics 85, 89--106.
• 10: LOOMIS, J. M., AND KNAPP, J. M. 2003. Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. In Virtual and Adaptive Environments, L. Hettinger and M. Haas, Eds. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 21--46.
• 11: LOOMIS, J. M., DA SILVA, J. A., FUJITA, N., AND FUKUSIMA, S. S. 1992. Visual space perception and visually directed action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HPP 18, 906--921.
• 12: MINETTI, A. E., ARDIGO, L. P., AND SAIBENE, F. 1994. The transition between walking and running in humans: Metabolic and mechanical aspects at different gradients. Acta Physiologia Scandinavica 150, 315--323.
• 13: PELAH, A., DURGIN, F. H., MILLER, C. M., WASHINGTON, T. A., AND NELSON, M. 1997. Adaptation to running depends on runner's frame of reference. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science 38, S1007.
• 14: RIESER, J. J., ASHMEAD, D. H., TALOR, C. R., AND YOUNGQUIST, G. A. 1990. Visual perception and the guidance of locomotion without vision to previously seen targets. Perception 19, 675--689.
• 15: RIESER, J. J., PICK, JR., H. L., ASHMEAD, D., AND GARING, A. 1995. Calibration of human locomotion and models of perceptual-motor organization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HPP 21, 480--497.
• 16: THOMPSON, W. B., WILLEMSEN, P., GOOCH, A., CREEM-REGEHR, S. H., LOOMIS, J., AND BEALL, A. in press. Does the quality of the computer graphics matter when judging distances in visually immersive environments? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.
• 17: Martin Usoh , Kevin Arthur , Mary C. Whitton , Rui Bastos , Anthony Steed , Mel Slater , Frederick P. Brooks, Jr., Walking > walking-in-place > flying, in virtual environments, Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, p.359-364, July 1999 [doi>10.1145/311535.311589]
• 18: WARREN, JR., W. H., KAY, B. A., AND YILMAZ, E. H. 1996. Visual control of posture during walking:functional specificity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: HPP 22, 818--838.
• 19: WITMER, B., AND SADOWSKI, JR., W. J. 1998. Nonvisually guided locomotion to a previously viewed target in real and virtual environments. Human Factors 40, 478--488.

INDEX TERMS

Primary Classification:
  I. Computing Methodologies
  I.3 COMPUTER GRAPHICS
      I.3.7 Three-Dimensional Graphics and Realism
          Subjects: Virtual reality

Additional Classification:
  H. Information Systems
  H.5 INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION (I.7)
      H.5.1 Multimedia Information Systems
          Subjects: Artificial, augmented, and virtual realities

Keywords:
locomotion, treadmill virtual environments, visual self-motion