ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Nonclairvoyant scheduling to minimize the total flow time on single and parallel machines
Full text PdfPdf (222 KB)
Source
Journal of the ACM (JACM) archive
Volume 51 ,  Issue 4  (July 2004) table of contents
Pages: 517 - 539  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISSN:0004-5411
Authors
Luca Becchetti  University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
Stefano Leonardi  University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 10,   Downloads (12 Months): 59,   Citation Count: 5
Additional Information:

abstract   references   cited by   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1008731.1008732
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Scheduling a sequence of jobs released over time when the processing time of a job is only known at its completion is a classical problem in CPU scheduling in time sharing operating systems. A widely used measure for the responsiveness of the system is the average flow time of the jobs, that is, the average time spent by jobs in the system between release and completion.The Windows NT and the Unix operating system scheduling policies are based on the Multilevel Feedback algorithm. In this article, we prove that a randomized version of the Multilevel Feedback algorithm is competitive for single and parallel machine systems, in our opinion providing one theoretical validation of the goodness of an idea that has proven effective in practice along the last two decades.The randomized Multilevel Feedback algorithm (RMLF) was first proposed by Kalyanasundaram and Pruhs for a single machine achieving an O(log n log log n) competitive ratio to minimize the average flow time against the on-line adaptive adversary, where n is the number of jobs that are released. We present a version of RMLF working for any number m of parallel machines. We show for RMLF a first O(log n log n/m) competitiveness result against the oblivious adversary on parallel machines. We also show that the same RMLF algorithm surprisingly achieves a tight O(log n) competitive ratio against the oblivious adversary on a single machine, therefore matching the lower bound for this case.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Acharya, S., Muthukrishnan, S., and Sundaram, G. 1999. Scheduling data delivery over multiple channels. Tech. rep., Bell Labs Technical Memo. (Available from acharya@research. bell-labs.com.)
 
2
 
3
Baker, K. R. 1974. Introduction to Sequencing and Scheduling. Wiley, New York.
 
4
5
 
6
 
7
Ben-David, S., Borodin, A., Karp, R., Tardos, G., and Wigderson, A. 1994. On the power of randomization in on-line algorithms. Algorithmica 11, 2--14.
 
8
 
9
 
10
Doeppner, T. W. 1987. Threads, a system for the support of concurrent programming. Tech. Rep. CS-87-11, Brown University.
 
11
 
12
IEEE. 1994. Institute for Electrical and Electronic Engineers. POSIX P1003.4a, Threads Extensions for Portable Operating Systems.
 
13
 
14
15
 
16
 
17
Mueller, F. 1993. A library implementation of POSIX threads under UNIX. In Proceedings of the USENIX Winter 1993 Technical Conference. 29--42.
 
18
19
 
20
SUN. 1993. Sunos 5.3 system services.
 
21


Collaborative Colleagues:
Luca Becchetti: colleagues
Stefano Leonardi: colleagues