ACM Home Page
Please provide us with feedback. Feedback
Digital Library logoTake a look at the new version of this page: [ beta version ]. Tell us what you think.
Using interactive technology in a short java course: an experience report
Full text PdfPdf (236 KB)
Source Annual Joint Conference Integrating Technology into Computer Science Education archive
Proceedings of the 9th annual SIGCSE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education table of contents
Leeds, United Kingdom
SESSION: Technology in CS education table of contents
Pages: 203 - 207  
Year of Publication: 2004
ISBN:1-58113-836-9
Also published in ...
Authors
Roberto E. Lopez-Herrejon  The University of Texas At Austin, Austin, TX
Morrie Schulman  The University of Texas At Austin, Austin, TX
Sponsors
ACM: Association for Computing Machinery
SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education
Publisher
ACM  New York, NY, USA
Bibliometrics
Downloads (6 Weeks): 4,   Downloads (12 Months): 27,   Citation Count: 0
Additional Information:

abstract   references   index terms   collaborative colleagues  

Tools and Actions: Request Permissions Request Permissions    Review this Article  
DOI Bookmark: Use this link to bookmark this Article: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1007996.1008051
What is a DOI?

ABSTRACT

Keeping students alert and responsive during lectures is a challenge even for experienced teachers in small group settings. Research has shown the importance of student participation and involvement in the learning process. Many ideas and strategies have been proposed to promote these two vital education elements [5]. Among them is the use of interactive technology where the instructor asks a question to the class and each student answers individually. These answers are tallied and the professor can get immediate, quantitative, and real-time feedback information that can be used to detect and address comprehension problems and to adapt the lecture plan accordingly. In this paper we report our experiences using a wireless interactive system named the Classroom Performance System (CPS) [9] in a fast-paced, short but comprehensive Java programming course. We present the challenges we faced and the lessons we learned in designing and delivering lectures using this type of technology.


REFERENCES

Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.

 
1
Abrahamson, Marty. Interactive Class Consulting. http://www.ph.utexas.edu/ ctalk/bulletin/UTBrownBag8_03.ppt.
 
2
Anderson, R.J., Anderson, R., VanDeGrift, T., Wolfman, S., Yasuhara K. Promoting Interaction in Large Classes with Computer-Mediated Feedback. To appear in CSCL 2003.
 
3
Better Education Inc. website http://www.bedu.com/
 
4
Bloom, D. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the classification of educational goals - Handbook I: Cognitive Domain, New York: McKay, 1956.
 
5
Boyle, J. Listening to Learners. http://www.strath.ac.uk/Departments/CAP/courses/interactive/powerpoint/, 2001.
 
6
Crouch, C.H., Mazur, E. Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69, 970--977, 2001.
 
7
Dufresne, R.J., Gerace, W.J., Leonard, W.J., Mestre, J.P. and Wenk, L. Classtalk: A classroom communication system for active learning. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 7, 3--47, 1996.
 
8
Educue website http://www.educue.com
 
9
eInstruction website http://www.einstruction.com
 
10
Hake, R. Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: a six thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66, 64--74, 1998.
 
11
Hake, R. Lessons from the Physics Education Reform Effort. Conservation Ecology 5(2): 28. http:/www.consecol.org/vol5/iss2/art28
 
12
Mazur, E. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ. Prentice-Hall, 1997.
 
13
Meltzer, D., Manivannan, K. Transforming the lecture-hall environment: The fully interactive physics lecture. American Journal of Physics, 70 (6), 639--654, 2002.
 
14
Meyers, C., Jones, T. Promoting Active Learning. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1993.
 
15
McDermott, L.C, Redish, E.F. RL-PER1: resource letter on physics education research. American Journal of Physics 67(9): 755--767. http://www.physics.umd.edu/rgroups/ripe/perg/cpt.html
 
16
Nicol, D.J., Boyle, J.T. Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education. 28(4), 457--473, 2003.
 
17
Palinscar, A.S. Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345--375, 1998.
 
18
University of Texas at Austin-CPS-support website: http://www.ph.utexas.edu/ ctalk/sectionIII.htm.
 
19
Woods, A., and Chiu, C. Wireless Response Technology in College Classrooms. The Technology Source, http://64.124.14.173, September/October 2003.

Collaborative Colleagues:
Roberto E. Lopez-Herrejon: colleagues
Morrie Schulman: colleagues