|
ABSTRACT
In the 21st century it is becoming increasingly common to work and learn in teams that are globally distributed. Such teams rely heavily on ICT to facilitate communication. There are many communication tools and technologies to choose from. This study investigates the effectiveness of a rich set of tools and considers if synergy exists between them. This paper reports and analyses the use of communication tools by students in a distributed Problem-based Learning (dPBL) environment. The PBL teams consisted of four students from Singapore and four from the UK. Teams had a rich set of synchronous and asynchronous communication tools available to them, including ISDN videoconference, WebCam video/audio, Microsoft NetMeeting® Chat, Asynchronous drop box and threaded discussion Forum. This ethnographic study showed that semantic discussion threads included the use of all tools and enabled students to effectively co-construct meaning (and understanding). Students were able to deploy the use of different tools effectively to achieve the learning outcomes intended for various stages in the PBL cycle, with both asynchronous and synchronous media being considered of high importance.
REFERENCES
Note: OCR errors may be found in this Reference List extracted from the full text article. ACM has opted to expose the complete List rather than only correct and linked references.
| |
1
|
Andreassen, E. F. (2000). Evaluating how students organise their work in a collaborative telelearning scenario: An activity theoretical perspective. Masters Thesis. Accessed on 15 June, 2003. <http://www.ifi.uib.no/docta/dissertations/andreassen/index.htm>
|
| |
2
|
Boud D, and Feletti, G., Ed. (1997). The Challenge of Problem-based Learning 2nd ed. London, Kogan Page.
|
| |
3
|
Björk, U. (2002), Distributed Problem-based learning in social economy - key issues in students' mastery of a structured method for education. Distance Education, Vol 23, No. 1.
|
 |
4
|
Ainslie Ellis , Linda Carswell , Andrew Bernat , Daniel Deveaux , Patrice Frison , Veijo Meisalo , Jeanine Meyer , Urban Nulden , Joze Rugelj , Jorma Tarhio, Resources, tools, and techniques for problem based learning in computing, Working Group reports of the 3rd annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE ITiCSE conference on Integrating technology into computer science education, p.41-56, December 1998, Dublin, Ireland
[doi> 10.1145/316572.358296]
|
| |
5
|
Goodyear, P. (2001) Effective networked learning in higher education: notes and guidelines. Centre for Studies in Advanced Learning Technology, Lancaster University. Accessed on 17 Oct 2 003 at <http://csalt.lancs.ac.uk/jisc/guidelines_final.doc>. p 82
|
 |
6
|
|
| |
7
|
Koschmann, T. (ed) (1996), CSCL: theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Malwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc
|
| |
8
|
McConnell, D. (2002), 'Action research and distributed problem-based learning in continuing professional education'. Distance Education, Vol. 23, No.1.
|
| |
9
|
Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A. M. (1994), Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 40--42
|
| |
10
|
Newman, M. (2003). A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of Problem Based Learning, Learning & Teaching Subject Network Centre for Medicine, Dentistry and Veterinary Medicine (LTSN-01) UK. p5
|
| |
11
|
|
 |
12
|
|
| |
13
|
Salmon, G (2000) E-Moderating, the key to Teaching and Learning online, London, UK, Kogan Page.
|
| |
14
|
Steinkuehler, C. A., Derry, S. J., Hmelo-Silver, C.E. & Demarcelle, M. (2002) Cracking the Resource Nut With Distributed Problem-Based Learning in Secondary Teacher Education. Distance Education Vol. 23, Issue 1, 23--39
|
| |
15
|
Woods, D. R. (1995), Problem-based learning: Resources to gain the most from PBL. Hamilton, ON: Don Woods.
|
|